Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. Rajendra AVSM VSM (Retd), PRESIDING MEMBER, Mr. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, MEMBER
M/s Mayank Multiplex Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sh Amit Kumar Ghosh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition filed under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. facts surrounding tenant agreement and payment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments surrounding contractual obligations and tenant rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's interpretation of property ownership and obligations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. definitions and standard for establishing consumer status. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. determining validity of agreement terms and identification of property. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. final court ruling and dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA AVSM VSM (Retd), PRESIDING MEMBER
1. This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) Order dated 07.02.2019 FA No. 1050/2017 which allowed the Appeal of the Complainant and set aside the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum Kolkata-III (South) („District Forum‟) order dated 30.08.2017 in CC No. 493/2016.
2. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
3. Brief facts of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
