Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
HON'BLE MR. SUBHASH CHANDRA, CJ, HON'BLE AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
M/s IDMC LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ERNST & YOUNG LLP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint filed under consumer protection act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on deficiency of services and consumer status (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. evidentiary documents presented by both parties (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. opposition's contentions on evidence and consumer status (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's deliberations on consumer definition under the act (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. definition of consumer as per supreme court judgments (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. final ruling and dismissal of complaint (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 (a)(i)of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) against the Opposite Party seeking to direct the OPs:
(i) Allow the instant Complaint filed by the Complainant.;
(ii)Pass an order holding the Opposite Parties 1 to 4 jointly and severally liable for the deficiency in providing service to the Complainant;
(iii)Pass an order directing the OPs to jointly and/ or severally forthwith remit to the Complainant a sum of Rs. 1,59,55,000/- towards the refund of the amount paid by the Complainant to the OPs;
(iv) Pass an order directing the OPs to jointly and/ or severally
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
