Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 5320
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
IQBAL AHMED, DEPUTY REGISTRAR
LIMBANNA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. – Respondent
REVISION PETITION NO. 283 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 327 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 328 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 329 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 330 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 331 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 332 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 333 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 334 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 335 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 336 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 337 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 338 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 339 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 340 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 341 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 342 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 343 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 344 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 345 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 346 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 347 OF 2022 | REVISION PETITION NO. 348 OF 2022
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kumarvinayakam Gupta, Mr. Girish Kumar
For the Respondents:
Procedural fairness requires that all defects in petitions be cured before substantive hearings can take place.
Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Revision petitions against orders of State Commission - Various petitions filed by legal heirs of deceased claimants against insurance company for compensation claims - Matters reported defective by Registry, allowing petitioners time to cure defects. (Paras 1-1)
(B) Procedural Fairness - Courts must ensure that all procedural defects are cured before proceeding with the substantive hearing of cases. (Paras 1-1)
Facts of the case:
Multiple revision petitions filed by legal heirs of deceased claimants against the insurance company regarding compensation claims. The Registry reported defects in the matters, allowing time for petitioners to rectify them.
Findings of Court:
The court allowed time for petitioners to cure defects in their filings.
Issues: The primary issue was the procedural defects in the petitions filed by the legal heirs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, stating that all defects must be cured before substantive hearings can occur.
Result: Matters listed for hearing on 26.04.2022 if defects are cured.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of revision petitions (Para 1) |
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 283 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2589/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2573/2022(Stay),IA/2574/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2575/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2576/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2577/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. LIMBANNA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 327 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2577/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2844/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2845/2022(Stay),IA/2846/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2847/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2848/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. MALLAPPA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 328 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2578/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2849/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2850/2022(Stay),IA/2851/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2852/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2853/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. BASAPPA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 329 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2579/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2854/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2855/2022(Stay),IA/2856/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2857/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2858/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. SARJARARAV & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 330 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2580/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2859/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2860/2022(Stay),IA/2861/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2862/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2863/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. GURAPPA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 331 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2581/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2864/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2865/2022(Stay),IA/2866/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2867/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2868/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. MALLAVYA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 332 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2585/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2869/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2870/2022(Stay),IA/2871/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2872/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2873/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. GIRIJIAVYA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 333 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2583/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2874/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2875/2022(Stay),IA/2876/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2877/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2878/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. MADEVAPPA & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 334 OF 2022 (Against the Order dated 30/08/2011 in Appeal No. 2584/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
WITH IA/2879/2022(Condonation of delay),IA/2880/2022(Stay),IA/2881/2022(Legal Heirs),IA/2882/2022(Setting aside of ex-parte),IA/2883/2022(Condonation of delay)
1. VEERAPPA SASAPPA DIBBADAMANI & ORS. ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. ...........Respondent(s)
REVISION
