SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 1657

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
S.H. RAO, J
SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PARUL JOSHI & 3 ORS. – Respondent
REVISION PETITION NO. 3022 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3023 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3024 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3025 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3026 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3028 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3029 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3030 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3031 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3032 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3033 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3034 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3035 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3036 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3037 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3038 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3039 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3040 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3041 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3042 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3043 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3044 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3045 OF 2017 | REVISION PETITION NO. 3046 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rajat Sang
For the Respondents:

Procedural compliance is essential in consumer disputes, and courts may grant time for rectifying defects in petitions.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 14, 17, 18, and 19 - Revision petitions against orders of State Commission - Petitioner bank seeks time to rectify defects in the petitions. The matter is to be listed for admission hearing upon curing the defects. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Procedural Compliance - The court emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in filing appeals and revisions. (Paras 1-2)

Facts of the case:
Multiple revision petitions filed by a bank against orders of the State Commission concerning consumer disputes. The petitions were found to have defects requiring rectification.

Findings of Court:
The court allows time for the petitioner to cure the defects and directs the listing of the matter for hearing upon compliance.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the defects in the revision petitions could be cured within the stipulated time.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that procedural compliance is essential for the maintenance of the judicial process and allows time for rectification of defects.

Result: The matter is to be listed for admission hearing on 16/11/2017, contingent upon curing defects.

Table of Content
1. parties involved in multiple revision petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3022 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1333/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. PARUL JOSHI & 3 ORS.

D/o. Parul Joshi, R/o. Sadar Bazar, Karoli Rajasthan

2. PRESIDENT, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

3. MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

4. DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

THROUGH PRESIDENT/MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD., TEHISL DHAMU, DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN ...........Respondent(s)

REVISION PETITION NO. 3023 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1334/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. NITYA PRAKASH GUPTA& 3 ORS.

S/O. Kirodilal Mittal, R/o. Maasalpur tehsil maasalpur Karoli Rajasthan

2. PRESIDENT, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI ...........Respondent(s)

SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND

3. MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

4. DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

THROUGH PRESIDENT/MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD., TEHISL DHAMU, DISTRICT-KAROLIRAJASHTAN REVISION PETITION NO. 3024 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1335/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. DHEERAJ MITTAL & 3 ORS.

S/O. Nityaprakash Gupta, R/o. Maasalpur DISTRICT-Karoli Rajasthan

2. PRESIDENT, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

3. MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

4. DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

THROUGH PRESIDENT/MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD., TEHISL DHAMU, DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN ...........Respondent(s)

REVISION PETITION NO. 3025 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1336/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. SHACHI GOYAL & 3 ORS.

D/o. Shachi Goyal, R/o. Sadar Bazar, Tehsil and District Karoli Rajasthan

2. PRESIDENT, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

3. MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

4. DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

THROUGH PRESIDENT/MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD., TEHISL DHAMU, DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN ...........Respondent(s)

REVISION PETITION NO. 3026 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1337/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. AFSANA & 3 ORS.

D/o. Jalalduddin, R/o. Sadar Bazar, Tehsil and District Karoli Rajasthan

2. PRESIDENT, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN

3. MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

DHAMMUPURA TEHSIL AND ...........Respondent(s)

4. DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD.

THROUGH PRESIDENT/MANAGER, DHAMMUPURA GRAM SEVA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD., TEHISL DHAMU, DISTRICT-KAROLI RAJASHTAN REVISION PETITION NO. 3027 OF 2017 (Against the Order dated 19/04/2017 in Appeal No. 1338/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)

1. SAVAI MADHOPUR KENDRIYA SEHKARI BANK LTD.

Head Office, Maan Town, Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. RUKMANI SHARMA & 3 ORS.

D/o. Rukmani Sharma, R/o. Sadar Ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top