Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A.P. Sahi, President, Bharatkumar Pandya, Member
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shahid – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals concerning compensation and delays in insurance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details regarding the hearing and procedural concerns. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the amount of insurance compensation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. issues related to calculations and interest awarded. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final assessment of compensation and conclusions drawn. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
ORDER
1. These two appeals arise out of a common order passed in CC/133/2015 by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow. The impugned order dated 06.05.2022 has been assailed by the Insurance Company questioning the correctness of the order whereas the complainant - Shahid has filed the other appeal praying for the grant of the entire relief to the maximum of Rs. 15,00,000/- along with interest as against the total loss of Rs. 16,88,992/-.
2. FA/747/2022 was heard earlier and was admitted on 30.04.2024 and the following order was passed:
"Admit.
Issue notice.
IA/9442/2022 has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The Office has reported delay of 118 days in filing the appeal. The impugned order was passed on 06.05.2022 and free copy was s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
