Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
INDER JIT SINGH, President, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, Member
PUMA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SURBHI GOYAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the complainant's booking and grievances. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the district commission's findings and orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarification of jurisdictional authority and consumer rights. (Para 11) |
| 4. concluding remarks on the dismissal of appeals. (Para 12 , 14) |
ORDER
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
1. Second Appeals have been filed challenging the order dated 13.12.2024 of the State Commission in FA/271/2024 and FA/233/2024 vide which First Appeals filed by the appellant herein was dismissed and orders of the District Commission dated 31.05.2024 in CC/864/2021 and order dated 30.04.2024 in CC/832/2021 respectively were upheld. As the issues involved in both the Second Appeal are broadly similar, these have been taken up together. For the sake of convenience, SA/253/2025 has been taken as the lead case. Para 1 of the order of the District Commission in CC/864/2021 sums up the facts of the case and the same is reproduced below:
"1. Briefly stated the complainant booked a plot with OP No. 3 by making payment of Rs.2,70,000/- as booking amount. The complainant was allotted plot No. IH-2-plot-361 by OP No. 3. However, the complainant misplace
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
