NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, Member
Ananta Nissan – Appellant
Versus
Complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural history. (Para 1) |
PER BHARATKUMAR PA ND YA. MEMBER
1. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/OP-2 dealer against the order of the State Commission, wherein State Commission while partly allowing the first appeal of the petitioner herein and confirming the order of the District Forum, maintained and fastened a liability for com pensation of Rs.2 lakhs on the petitioner. The case of the respondent no.1 /com plainant before the District Forum was that com plainant purchased a vehicle from petitioner/OP-2 in the month of March, 2017 and insurance was taken from respondent no. 2. The vehicle m et with an accident in the month of January, 2019. Respondent No.2 insurer appointed a surveyor to assess the damage. Although delayed, approval was granted for reimbursem ent by the Insurance Company, pursuant to which the repair works were commenced by the Petitioner. Significantly, while doing so, certain faults in the engine of the vehicle were ascertained, and the same was com municated to the Insurance Com pany for seeking approval, as it involved further repairing charges which the Petitioner cannot undertake without the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.