NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BHARATKUMAR RAND YA, MEMBER
DR. K.K. GOYAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
GURPREET SINGH – Respondent
PER BHARATKUMAR RAND YA. MEMBER
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners/opposite party against the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by the State Com m ission, Punjab, in First Appeal No. 1579 of 2012, whereby State Com m ission allowed the appeal of the com plainant and set aside the order of the District Forum and directed the OP doctors to pay Rs.2.3 lakhs to the com plainant.
2. Brief fact of the case are that respondent/com plainant suffered a road side injury and got adm itted to the hospital of the petitioner/O P doctor on 12.09.2011.The com plainant was operated on 13.09.2011 after necessary tests and evaluation of an X-Ray dated 12.09.2011. As per practice the operative site was visualized under C-Arm im age intensifier and the com plainant was discharged on 14.09.2011 in satisfactory condition with cast on the injured joint. After follow-up the cast was rem oved on 12.10.2011.The com plainant was prescribed hot fom entation, Syastaflam e gel and Active Exercises. The com plainant visited the petitioner last on 24.10.2011. Thereafter as per com plaint filed before the District Forum , com plainant approached Dr. Sanjeev Arora of Civil Hospital Barnala





Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.