Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BHARATKUMAR RAND YA, MEMBER
DR. K.K. GOYAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
GURPREET SINGH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and disposal of the revision petition. (Para 1 , 9) |
| 2. factual background of the case. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's analysis of the medical procedure and follow-up. (Para 3 , 4) |
PER BHARATKUMAR RAND YA. MEMBER
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners/opposite party against the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by the State Com m ission, Punjab, in First Appeal No. 1579 of 2012, whereby State Com m ission allowed the appeal of the com plainant and set aside the order of the District Forum and directed the OP doctors to pay Rs.2.3 lakhs to the com plainant.
2. Brief fact of the case are that respondent/com plainant suffered a road side injury and got adm itted to the hospital of the petitioner/O P doctor on 12.09.2011.The com plainant was operated on 13.09.2011 after necessary tests and evaluation of an X-Ray dated 12.09.2011. As per practice the operative site was visualized under C-Arm im age intensifier and the com plainant was discharged on 14.09.2011 in satisfactory condition with cast on the injured joint. After follow-up the cast was rem oved on 12.10.2011.The com plainant was prescribed hot fom entation, Syastaflam e gel and Active Exerc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
