SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 89

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SHAILESH SRIVASTAV & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
VATIKA LTD. – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S. THE CHAMBERS OF BHAGAT ,Respondent Advocate: M/S. INDUSLAW

Date of pronouncement:-19.01.2026 IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 2683 OF 2018

1. MR. SHAILESH SRIVASTAVA

2. MRS. RUCHI SRIVASTAVA BOTH RESIDING AT:

A-903, APEX APARTMENT, SECTOR-45, GURGAON HARYANA-122002 ….. COMPLAINANT Versus VATIKA LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT VATIKA TRIANGLE, 4TH FLOOR, SUSHANT LOK PHASE I, BLOCK A, MEHRAULI - GURGAON ROAD HARYANA-122002. ....... OPP. PARTY BEFORE:

HON'BLE AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (RETD.), PRESIDING MEMBER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER Appearance at the time of arguments:-

For the Complainant : Mr. Amit Bhagat & Ms. Arzoo Raj, Advocates.

For the Opposite Parties : Ms. Prerna Sharma, Advocate (VC)

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER

ORDER

1. In brief, Complainant No. 1 and 2, being husband and wife, jointly applied for allotment of a 3BHK flat at pre-launch stage in residential project, Vatika Turning Point in Sector 88B, Gurgaon, Haryana floated on behalf of opposite party (Vatika Ltd.), in the month of July, 2016. Since it was assured that the project is getting launched within a month and possession would be handed over within three years by August, 2019, an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top