NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DIVISIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
BATTALA SUDHAKAR BABU – Respondent
NC/RP/1553/2022
##PAGE1##
IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AT NEW DELHI
NC/RP/1553/2022
(Against the order dated 22.08.2022 in Appeal No. 189/2018 of the Telangana
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission)
With
NC/IA/11171/2022(Stay)
Divisional Manager,
National Insurance Company Limited & Anr. Appellant (s)
Versus
Battala Sudhakar Babu ... Respondent (s)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT
HON'BLE MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER
For the Appellant (s) : Mr. Gaurav Nair and Mr. Geo Kennedy K., Advocates
For the Respondent (s) : Ms. Prerna Robin, Advocate
PRONOUNCED ON : 30.01.2026
ORDER
JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT
1. This revision petition arises out of an order passed by the SCDRC,
Telangana, whereby the State Commission has reversed the order of
the District Commission dated 10.05.2018 in CC/51/2016. The
complaint filed by the respondent/ complainant had been dismissed by
the District Commission against which he filed appeal no. 189/2018 and
the State Commission while allowing the appeal has awarded the
RP/1553/2022 Page | 1
I
##PAGE2##amount claimed in respect of the loss suffered by the complainant due
to the accident of his lorry bearing Registration No. AP 04 TU 9119.
2. The District Commission had dismissed the complaint without
appreciating the survey reports that came to be filed before the State
Commission in appeal. The vehicle had suffered loss on account of an
accident resulting in an electrocution due to electric wires having come
into contact as a result whereof the entire vehicle was gutted. The case
was of a total loss. The District Commission arrived at the conclusion
that the complainant had kept quiet about the extent of load being
carried by the vehicle and after relying on a couple of decisions held
that there was no deficiency in service. We may point out that the claim
had been repudiated by the Insurance Company vide repudiation letter
dated 02.12.2016, on the ground that there was another person
travelling in the said vehicle at the time of accident for which no extra
premium for carrying a gratuitous passenger had been paid. The
second ground taken was that the document relating to the load of
consignment carried by the vehicle was found to be fake on verification
of two investigators through their reports dated 29.04.2016 and
13.09.2016.
3. At this juncture, it would be appropriate to reproduce the said reports
referred to in the letter Of repudiation. The report dated 29.04.2016 is
extracted herein under:
RP/1553/2022 Page | 2
##PAGE3##Non.
Vijs-y Kumar Gaur
IrJVEoTiGATOR Office & Residence
> * B-161, Kamla Nehru Nagor
■ jtaG si f— ic * X aJ .." ■*■■ S&uUbd4d1U-2rSfeSj4) S n EXT. Near Arora Park,
JODHPUR-342 003
_______S 0291-2756548
Re£ So.- PRIVATE fc CONyiDENTSAZ.
DATE29.04.2Ci6
: iHi ft 9 y ’
Wk cp'rafrfri-
3.->—T33—3^>rt :- 552400/■e•l aiin 1•5-16/1568 dated 30.03.2016
WT3:— wft.3{R. ‘’Hcill’H EOng ]
4IPrt :— eft. gyidR ' -
; ^Sel:- 1U-19/GE-2939
3ffcRft-rt>4tn:- 552400/31 /14 /630C^I|Q •
sjtt Y -gst mFi K rj -i9/ge -29S9 tri Pert >.vs.
S.T.C. Cargo’s 3ft sp-iko 101 33 WJIM-i I>tY .'mi—WT B.T.C. Cargo's gRT
?f£fWe an 3jf?r^?5 f^ur, fvRnfr nraq 4 b.t .c. Cargo’s
sa ?T7cTFW, CTferp f&Rf rHTUfem Wr 3 TFW 3R -giRf TRrfiftyff 3n
SPpta fftnn. vft B.T.C. Cargo’s tte A vYsiR. srHTOT 101 J5T
3R 3c1iqi fftl sfiKI Sfr.STR. Kpfifr vtT^ H nTfilft xjnf
W3 RJ-19/GE-2989 3 W vHx> IftniT ■’TC: t
3-Rlfn ftRcT OT ft?T nft Irft.OT?. 101 g £ |
' 3T=tt^s fitHT fftRft V«f fftHT vTTTO OjfeRft
aiRREnp jriddifl 5Rga fW w 11. ' ~ "
• (fdMiii tgHfJnYg )
fate
gHf |
•J
4. Translation of the same has also been filed stating that on verification
M/s. BTC Cargo have informed that the concerned good receipts as
relied on by the complainant had not been issued by them.
5. The second investigator appointed by the Insurance Company, namely,
M/s. Pearl Insutech Private Limited tendered a report on 13.09.2016.
RP/1553/2022 Page | 3
##PAGE4##This investigator was engaged to carry out an LR verification in respect
of a document issued by M/s. Mama Roadlines. They could not get any
informati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.