NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PRADIP SONAVANE S/o. babaram sonavane – Appellant
Versus
DSD INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Through its directors – Respondent
V IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT NEW DELHI With NC/IA/1255-1256/2026 (Directions and Exemption)
Pradip Sonavane & Anr. Complainant(s)
Versus DSSD Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Opp. Party (ies)
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT HON'BLE MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER For the Complainant:LKJIHGMFEr.D CMBitAhil Sampat, Advocate Ms. Tanisha Sampat, Advocate PRONOUNCED ON : 18.02.2026
ORDER
JUSTICE A.P. SAHL PRESIDENT
1. The two complainants before us are husband and wife, who have come up complaining about the deficiencies against the developer/ builder - opposite party no. 1, herein represented by the opposite party nos. 2, 3 & 4 and also the opposite party no. 5, Shree Nandadeep Bhavan Co-operative Housing Society Limited, broadly on two grounds.
2. The deficiency alleged is about a defective parking slot having been provided to the complainants and the Developers acting in violation of the legal provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The second complain is with regard to certain alleged deficiencies regarding the shortage of carpet area and other unauthorised constructions and deviations as entailed in paragraph 3S of the comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.