JUDGMENT

DR.SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.

1. Briefly stated the facts as per the complaint are that Dilip Debnath/the respondent/the complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘the complainant’) intended to purchase a vehicle model no LPT-1512 from the appellant/the opposite party no 1 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the opposite party no 1’) for his business purpose. The complainant visited office of the opposite party no 1 where an agreement was signed between them and the complainant was advised to deposit down payment. The complainant accordingly had deposited Rs. 3,30,500/- in three instalments i.e. Rs. 1,50,000/- on 05.01.2020, Rs. 1,60,000/- on 31.10.2020 and Rs. 20,500/- on 03.11.2020 for purchase of vehicle model TATA LPT-1512 from the opposite party no.1 against proper receipts bearing serial nos. 12401 and 12414 for amounting to Rs. 1,50,000/- and Rs. 20,500/- respectively issued by Bijan Debnath, authorized signatory/the opposite party no 2/the proforma appellant no 1 on behalf of the opposite party no1. The complainant deposited Rs.1,60,000/- in the account of the opposite party no 1 through bank transfer under the account bearing no 3569110010051404 on 31.10.2020 in Ujjivan Small Fin