SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 3006

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
N MURUGAN S/o. T N NATARAJAN vs


Petitioner Advocates:MURUGANANDAM ,Respondent Advocate:

IN TH E N A TIO N A L C O N S U M E R D IS P U TE S R E D R E S S A L COMMISSION, N E W D E LH I M A /524/2025 IN R E V IS IO N P E TITIO N N O .930 O F 2025 (Against the order dated 31.07.2024 in FA No.471 of 2022 of the State Commission, Tamil Nadu)

■ Mr. N Murugan ... Petitioner versus M/s. Avalon Properties Partnership Firm Rep. by its Partners V. Vijayakumar & Ors. ... Respondents DCBA B E FO R E:

H O NB LE A VM J. R A JEN D R A , A VSM VSM (R ETD .), PR ESID IN G M EM B ER H O NB LE M R . JU STIC E A N O O P K U M A R M EN D IR A TTA , M EM B ER For Petitioner : Mr. Muruganandam, Advocate (VC)

D ated : 26-11-2025

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant with respect to MA/524 of

2025 seeking restoration of Revision Petition, which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 24.09.2025.

Considering the submission made, MA/504/2025 is allowed and

2.

Revision Petition No.930 of 2025 is restored to its original number.

3. As per the record of the Registry, there is a delay of 153 days in filing this Revision Petition. The Petitioner filed IA No.7968/2025 seeking Condonation of delay. In the said IA, the learned counsel for the Petitioner stated that he has received the order copy in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top