NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJIV – Respondent
NC/RP/1171/2018
##PAGE1##
IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION AT NEW DELHI
RESERVED ON : 01.12.2025
PRONOUNCED ON : 23.12.2025
REVISION PETITION NO.1171 OF 2018
(Against the order dated 09.10.2017 in Appeal No.1251/2016
Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula)
IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Iffco Tower-II, Plot No.3,
Sector 29, Gurugram,
Haryana-122001. … Petitioner
VERSUS
Rajiv
S/o Gulshan Kumar
R/o 92, Vikas Nagar,
Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhri,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. … Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE AVM JONNALAGADDA RAJENDRA, AVSM, VSM (Retd),
PRESIDING MEMBER
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
For the Petitioner : Mr.D. Satya Sai Sumanth, Advocate (VC)
For the Respondent : Nemo (Exparte vide order dt.01.12.2025)
JUDGMENT
AVM JONNALAGADDA RAJENDRA, AVSM, VSM (Retd), MEMBER
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21(b)
of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Haryana
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula („the
State Commission‟) order dated 09.10.2017 in FA No.1251/2016
dismissing the Appeal filed by the OP/ Petitioner and affirmed the
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Yamuna Nagar („the
District Forum‟) order dated 20.10.2016 in C.C. No.362/2013.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the
original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
RP No.1171 of 2018 Page 1 of 11
##PAGE2##3. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainant, are that the
complainant, Rajiv (respondent herein), is the registered owner of
tractor bearing registration No. HR-02Z-3842, which he had insured
with IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd (“the Insurance
Company”/ “the Opposite Party - OP”) vide Policy No. 78669789 for
the period from 23.12.2011 to 22.12.2012, with the Insured Declared
Value (IDV) of Rs. 4,75,000. During the intervening night of
26/27.04.2012, the tractor was parked outside the house of the
complainant‟s driver, but in the morning of 27.04.2012 at about 7:00
A.M., it was found missing, having been stolen by unknown persons.
FIR No.168 dated 27.04.2012 was promptly lodged at Police Station
City Yamuna Nagar. The Insurance Company was also duly informed
and supplied with all requisite documents. However, vide letter dated
04.03.2013, the Insurer repudiated the claim. Consequently, the
complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum under Section
12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking a direction to the OP
to honour the insurance claim, along with compensation of
Rs.3,00,000/- and litigation expenses of Rs. 15,000/-.
4. The OP Insurer, in written version, raised preliminary objections
regarding the complainant‟s locus standi, territorial jurisdiction of the
District Forum Yamuna Nagar, and maintainability of the complaint.
While admitting issuance of the policy for the relevant period with IDV
of Rs. 4,75,000, the OP contended that upon receipt of intimation of
theft, the claim was registered and Shri Sonu Bhola, Advocate, was
appointed as Investigator. The Investigator‟s report revealed violation
of policy conditions, specifically that the tractor was being used for
„hire and reward.‟ Relying on the said report, the OP repudiated the
claim, terming it a “no claim” case on the ground of breach of policy
terms. It was asserted that the complainant is not entitled to any relief,
and dismissal of the complaint with costs was prayed for.
RP No.1171 of 2018 Page 2 of 11
##PAGE3##5. The learned District Forum vide Order dated 20.10.2016 partly
allowed the complaint and relevant portion is as under:-
“Resultantly, we partly allow the complaint of complainant
and direct the OP Insurance Company to pay a sum of
Rs.3,56,250/- i.e. 75% of the insured value of Rs.4,75,000/- on
non-standard basis within a period of 30 days after
preparation of copy of this order failing which the OP
Insurance Company shall also be liable to pay interest at the
rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of complaint till
its realization subject to submission of subro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.