Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Inder Jit Singh, PRESIDING MEMBER, Sudhir Kumar Jain, MEMBER
M/s Ambika Realcon Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Naveen Kumar Pathak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of appeals and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. opposition responses to complaints. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. consumer complaint ruling. (Para 9) |
| 4. arguments presented by both appellants and respondents in appeals. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. legal analyses and arguments regarding contract obligations. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. opposition's argument on facts and legal standing. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. court's decision on jurisdiction and legal statutes. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. determination of service provisions and compliance obligations. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. rights to compensation and timing of possession delivery. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. dealing with misjoinder and other technical objections. (Para 22) |
| 11. final ruling and dismissal of appeals. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT
Date: 27.02.2025 DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
1. The present common judgment proposed to decide 33 First Appeals preferred by the complainants and the opposite parties no 1& 2 (each filed 11 Appeals) arising out of the common order dated 21.09.2023 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal FIRST APPEAL No. 1070 OF 2023 along with 32 connected F.A.S 29 \\MLKJIHGFEDCBA Commission, Chandig
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
