Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Inder Jit Singh, Presiding Member, Sudhir Kumar Jain, J
A.B. Motors Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh Jain – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. vehicle purchase, accident, partial airbag deployment under warranty. (Para 1 , 12) |
| 2. lower forums found manufacturing defect, ordered refund. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners argue no defect proof, mandatory lab test required. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. res ipsa loquitur infers defect; no expert needed. (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. no jurisdictional error; revisions dismissed. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
JUDGMENT
DR.SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. The relevant facts arising from the record are that Yogesh Jain/the complainant in the complaint/the respondent no 1 in revision petitions bearing no 2602/2017 and 2603/2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the complainant”) purchased Ford Eco Sport (optional) (hereinafter referred to as “the vehicle”) bearing chassis no MAJAXXMRKAFY50957 and engine no FY50957 from Ford India Private Limited/the opposite party no 1 in the complaint/the respondent no 2 in revision petition no 2602/2017 and the petitioner in revision petition no 2603/2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the manufacturer”) through dealer A.B. Motors Private Limited (Bhagat Ford), Amritsar/the opposite party no 2 in the complaint/the petitioner in revision petition no 2602/2017 and the re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
