Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Inder Jit Singh, Presiding Member, Sudhir Kumar Jain, Member
Alok Jain – Appellant
Versus
Jaguar Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts, booking details, and allegations regarding delayed possession and unfair trade practices. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. summation of parties' contentions regarding jurisdiction and liability. (Para 5) |
| 3. establishment of maintainability and pecuniary jurisdiction for class action proceedings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. discussion on deficiency of service, rejection of force majeure, and invalidation of one-sided agreement clauses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. adjudication of the quantum of refund and directions for compensatory interest. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
1. The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainants (a class of homebuyers) against the Opposite Party, inter alia praying for directions to the Opposite Party:
i. To refund the entire principal amounts deposited by each of the Complainants towards their respective units in the project "Aryan Apartment";
ii. To pay interest @24% per annum on the refunded amounts from the date of each deposit till realization;
iii. To pay compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- per comp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
