NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. SATISH K. AROLKAR – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL M. GAGLANI – Respondent
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
ORDER
1. Three separate Revision Petitions have been preferred on behalf of the complainant (Sushil Mukesh Gaglani) bearing No.681, 682 and 683 of 2022, before this Commission assailing Order dated 17.03.2020 passed by the learned State Commission, Maharashtra whereby three separate Appeals preferred on behalf of the opposite parties No.1 to 4 {(i.e. Appeal No.A/19/203 preferred by Dr. Madhuri Aggarwal (OP-3 in the complaint; Appeal No. A/19/205 preferred by Life Cell International Pvt. Ltd. and Chetan Purushottam (OP-1 and 2 in the complaint) and Appeal No. A/19/438 preferred by Dr. Satish Kishoranadn Arolkar (OP-4 in the complaint)} were partly allowed.
2. The aforesaid Order dated 17.03.2020 passed by the learned State Commission has also been separately challenged by OPs 1 to 4 by way of three separate Revision Petitions {i.e RP No.182 of 2021 preferred by Lifecell International Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Chetan Purushottam/OP-1 & 2; Revision Petition No.1183 of 2020 preferred by Dr. Madhuri Agarwal/OP-3 and Revision Petition No.1038 of 2020 preferred by Dr. Satish Kishoranadn Arolkar/OP-4}.
The Revisionists and respondents hereinafter are referred to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.