Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
J. Rajendra, Presiding Member, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, Member
Delhi Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Bhanwar Singh Rajwat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to allotment cancellation due to payment default. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the cancellation and the reasonableness of the claims made. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the mandatory nature of payment schedules and the appropriate equitable remedy. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. Present petition preferred on behalf of DDA (Opposite Party in the original complaint) assails Order dated 12.01.2021 passed by the learned Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in FA No.470 of 2015, whereby the appeal preferred on behalf of the complainant Bhanwar Singh Rajwat (Respondent herein) was allowed. Petitioner and respondent are hereinafter referred to as Complainant and Opposite Party as appearing in the complaint, for the sake of convenience.
2. Facts fall within a narrow encompass. Complainant Bhanwar Singh Rajwat registered for allotment of MIG flat under Ambedkar Awas Yojna vide application dated 29.12.1989, reflecting his residential address as Quarter No.104, Sidhoran Kalan, Delhi. Complainant was declared successful for allotment of MIG flat under afore-said scheme on hire purchase basis a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
