SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 436

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DHULCHAND SHANKAR NAIK – Appellant
Versus
VIR BHAN SHARMA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ADV. ASHISH KUMAR PANDEY ,Respondent Advocate:

ORDER

1. The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the appellant/opposite party being aggrieved of the order dated 03.10.2024, passed by the learned Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (for short the ‘State Commission’) in consumer complaint No. 678 of 2019.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant is present. Learned proxy counsel for the respondents is also present and submitted that the arguing counsel is not available today therefore, the matter may be adjourned.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant vehemently opposed the adjournment and submitted, since Non-bailable warrant has already been issued against the appellant therefore, the matter may be heard today itself. Upon it, the learned proxy counsel present in the Court submits that he is ready to argue the matter.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and proxy counsel for the respondent on delay condonation application being IA/7511/2025.

5. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is ex-parte against the appellant. No notice was served / received by the appellant of the proceed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top