NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member(Judicial)) , Hon'ble Mr. Jatindranath Swain (Member (Technical)) ,
M/s. Bhagyodayam Company represented by its Administrator Mr. Jinan K.R. – Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Hyma Joseph – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Hybrid Mode)
Per : Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial):
1. These are bunch of 18 Company Appeals, which had been preferred under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, wherein the Appellants in each of these Company Appeals put challenge to the Impugned Order dated 02.12.2022, which almost happens to be akin in nature in all the Company Appeals. Besides that, since these Company Appeals engage consideration of a common question of fact and law, for the purposes of brevity, they are being decided together.
2. As far as, Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 05 / 2023, the Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 06 / 2023, Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 21 / 2023 & Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 22 / 2023, the notices have been sent by this Tribunal, to the respective Respondent and ever since, the institution of these Company Appeals, none has appeared for the Respondents, despite service of notice. Hence, these four Appeals are being proceeded exparte.
3. Because of the fact that in each of the Company Appeals, there were different Interlocutory Applications, which were considered and decided, we feel it apt to summarily describe each of the Appeals, qua the order, which has been put to c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.