Page 1 of 213 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 503 of 2021 IN THE MATTER OF: Bank of Maharashtra Stressed Asset Management Branch Janmangal 4th Floor, 45/47, Mumbai Samachar Marg, Opposite to Stock Exchange, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 Through its General Manager, Mrs. Chitra Datar Zonal Manager Delhi …Appellant Vs. 1.Videocon Industries Ltd. …Respondent No.1 2.Videocon Telecommunications Limited …Respondent No.2 3.Evans Fraser & Company (India) Limited …Respondent No.3 4.Millennium Appliances (India) Limited …Respondent No.4 5.Applicomp India Limited …Respondent No.5 6.Electroworld Digital Solutions Limited …Respondent No.6 7.Techno Kart India …Respondent No.7 8.Century Appliances Limited …Respondent No.8 9.Techno Electronics Limited …Respondent No.9 10.Value Industries Ltd. …Respondent No.10 11. PE Electronics Ltd …Respondent No.11 12. CE India Ltd. …Respondent No.12 Page 2 of 213 13.Sky Appliances Ltd. …Respondent No.13 All aforesaid Respondent Nos. 1-13 Through their Resolution Professional, Mr. Abhijit Guhathakurta, Flat No.701, A Wing, Satyam Springs, CTS No. 272A/2/1, Off BSD marg, Deonar, Mumbai, City, Maharashtra – 400 088 And having his CIRP Correspondence address at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP Indiabulls Finance Centre, Tower 3, 27th Floor, Senapti Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road (West), Maharashtra 400 013 14. Committee of Creditors of the Consolidated CIRP of Resolution Process of Videocon Group Companies as Consolidated by order dated 08th August, 2019 Through State Bank of India being The Lead Member of the CoC; …Respondent No.14 15.Twinstar Technologies Limited 3rd Floor, IFFCO Tower, Pl No.3, Sector 39, Gurugram, Gurgaon, Haryana – 122 002, India …Respondent No.15 Present: For Appellant: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Garima Prashad, Sr. Advocate Mr. Chaitanya B. Nikte, Mr. Ayush Negi, Mr. Rajiv K. Virmani, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Mr. Prakash Singh, Mr. Prasad Sarvankar, Mr. Sumedh Ruikar, Mr. Gaurav Jain, Mr. Atul Malhotra, Mr. Karan Valecha, Ms. Sneha Bhange, Advocates for Appellant Bank of Maharashtra For Respondents: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anoop Rawat, Ms. Meghna Rajadhyaksha, Mr. Page 3 of 213 Zeeshan Khan, Mr. Vaijayant Paliwal, Ms. Radhika Indapurkar, Ms. Mohana Nijhawan, Mr. Chaitanya Safaya, Mr. Bryan Pillai, Ms. Moulshree Shukla, Ms. Ishani Mookherjee, Ms. Priya Singh, Mr. Ameya Gokhale, Advocates for R1 to 13
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-14, COC. |
| Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Advocate, Mr Gopal Jain, |
| Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar Maheshwari, Advocate |
| and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, Advocate for R-15. |
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-14, COC. |
| Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Advocate Mr Gopal Jain, |
| Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar Maheshwari, Advocate |
| and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, Advocate for R-15. |
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-2 |
| Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar |
| Maheshwari, Advocate and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, |
| Advocate for R-3 |
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-14, COC. |
| Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Advocate, Mr Gopal Jain, |
| Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar Maheshwari, Advocate |
| and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, Advocate for R-15. |
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-14, COC. |
| Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Advocate Mr Gopal Jain, |
| Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar Maheshwari, Advocate |
| and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, Advocate for R-15. |
| Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India with |
| Mr. Bishwajit Dubey, Mr. Madhav Kanoria, Ms. |
| Surabhi Khattar, Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Mr. Prafful |
| Goyal, Advocates for R-2 |
| Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate, Mr Diwakar |
| Maheshwari, Advocate and Mr Shreyas Edupuganti, |
| Advocate for R-3 |
JUDGEMENT
DR. ASHOK KUMAR MISRHA, TECHNICAL MEMEBR Contents:
| SL No. | Particulars | Para No. | Page No. |
| A. | Brief Background | 04-08 | 12-16 |
| B. | Submissions by the parties | 09-18 | 17-174 |
| C. | Analysis of facts, law and reasons | 19-49 | 174-212 |
| D. | Conclusion | 50 | 213 |
| SL No. | Particulars | Para No. | Page No. |
| A. | Brief Background | 04-08 | 12-16 |
| B. | Submissions by the parties | 09-18 | 17-174 |
| C. | Analysis of facts, law and reasons | 19-49 | 174-212 |
| D. | Conclusion | 50 | 213 |
1. All these appeals have been filed by the ‘Appellants' under Section 61 of the ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016’ (in short ‘Code’) against the impugned order dated 08.06.2021 passed by the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ (National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Court No.II at Mumbai) in IA No. 196/2021 in CP (IB) No. 02/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 01/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 508/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 509/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 507/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 511/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 510/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 562/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 512/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 560/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 528/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 564/MB/C-II/2018 and CP (IB) 563/MB/C-II/2018 wherein the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ has approved the ‘Resolution Plan’ submitted by ‘Resolution Applicant’ - ‘Twin Star Technologies Limited’.
2. Since all these appeals have sought basically to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 08.06.2021 of the Adjudicating Authority, it was thought fit and proper to be heard together and disposed off by a common judgment. Accordingly, we are proceedings in the matter. 3. Vide order dated 19.07.2021, this Tribunal has stayed the impugned order and directed status quo ante as before passing of the impugned order to be maintained. Resolution Professional will continue to manage the Corporate Debtor as per provisions of the Code.
A. Brief background Page 13 of 213
4. The available record reveals that ‘Videocon Group’ was founded in the year 1984 and commenced its business from Marathwada region which expanded across India and worldwide. In the initial stage, this group was involved in local television manufacturing. The same was diversified in multiple business portfolio in oil and gas, retail, telecom, insurance and real estate sector. The ‘Videocon Industries Limited’ (VIL) is a listed company on the ‘National Stock Exchange’ (NSE) and the ‘Bombay Stock Exchange’ (BSE) with its promoter group holding 62.27% share. A ‘consortium of bankers’ led by ‘State Bank of India’ (SBI) has rendered its financial debt facilities to the Videocon group. It is also observed that the Videocon’s telecom business obtained 21, 2G telecom licenses from the then prevailing government which was cancelled at a later date and this impacted the Videocon’s Telecom business. They were repaying the agreed instalments to the consortium of lenders till 2015. VIL and ‘Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited’ jointly bought oil and gas assets through “joint venture”. It also reflects that from May, 2016, the VIL alongwith 13 others companies of Videocon groups were classified as ‘SMA – 2’ due to late payment of instalments in the year 2016 onwards.
5. It is also reflected from the ‘Appeal Paper book’ that VIL and its other group companies (12 domestic subsidiary) and their lenders entered into a ‘Syndicated Rupee Term Loan Agreement’ dated 08.08.2012 as-obligor - co-obligator on the one hand and the banks and financial institutions as the group of lenders with SBI as Page 14 of 213 Facility Agent and SBICaps Trustee Company Limited as the onshore Security Trustee. Entities of Videocon group with respective orders were under CIRP and the action taken by the lead bank i.e. SBI under Section 7 of the Code and few companies who are also part of the group, certain ‘Operational Creditors’ (OC) had filed insolvency petition.
List of 13 Videocon group companies taken from Form- H- Compliance Certificate given by RP at 70 of the Appeal paper book in CA(AT) (Ins) No. 505 of 2021.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.