SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1152

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
N/A, N/A
Anil Kumar Ojha – Appellant
Versus
CS C Ramasubramaniam – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Anil Kumar Ojha
For the Respondents: S. Sathiyanarayanan

ORDER

(Hybrid Mode)

24.04.2024:

1. Very short issue which is involved consideration, herein before this Tribunal, is regards maintainability of proceedings as drawn under Section 340 of Cr.P.C., before the learned Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant herein being aggrieved against the rejection of IA/1126/2023, had preferred this Company Appeal. By virtue of the Impugned Order dated 24.07.2023, as a consequence of the impugned decision rendered by the learned Adjudicating Authority, on the aforesaid Interlocutory Application, on 24th July 2023, the National Company Law Tribunal, has taken a view that IA as preferred by the Appellant under Section 340 (1) Cr. P. C. before it, would not be sustainable before the Tribunal by drawing an opinion, that the Tribunal since being a Special Court, as per the Provisions contained under Section 236(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, hence, the same would lack the power to draw the proceedings of Contempt under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. Heard the Appellant in person and the Learned Counsel for the Respondent, after having perused the Impugned Judgment dated 24.07.2023 under challenge, and the entire records.

3. The c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top