SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 1490

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
INDEVAR PANDEY, MEMBER (T)
THE COSMOS CO. OP. BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Mr. KAILASH T. SHAH – Respondent
CP (IB) No. 72 of 2018 | IA No. 195 (AHM)2024 | IA/522(AHM) 2021



Advocates:
For Appellant: Mr. Ramchandra Madan, Mr. Tushar Nigam
For Respondents: Ms. Honey Satpal, Mr. Nipun Singhvi, Ms. Pooja Singh, Mr. Akash Agarwalla, Ms. Ritu Guru

The court reaffirmed the status of statutory dues under the Gujarat VAT Act as secured interests, emphasizing the supremacy of judicial interpretations in insolvency proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 61 - Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Section 48 - Appeal against order regarding secured creditor status - Appellant contested adjudicating authority's direction to treat State Tax Department as a secured creditor and release funds contrary to approved resolution plan - Court emphasized adherence to Supreme Court precedents affirming statutory charge of State as security interest under IBC - Adjudicating Authority did not exceed jurisdiction in ordering distribution based on legality of claims - Resulted in maintaining integrity of resolution process. (Paras 1, 56-72)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, a financial creditor, challenged an order directing the release of funds to the State Tax Department, claiming the authority had wrongly treated it as a secured creditor contrary to prior approved resolutions. (Paras 3-4)

Findings of Court:
The NCLAT affirmed that the adjudicating authority correctly applied the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Gujarat VAT Act, which conferred secured creditor status on the State Tax Department. (Paras 56-72)

Issues: Whether the Adjudicating Authority had jurisdiction to alter the financial distribution of an approved resolution plan based on the classification of statutory dues. (Paras 44-46)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that adherence to the statutory provisions and prior judicial rulings was essential, thus upholding the secured status of the State Tax Department, aligning with the insolvency framework. (Paras 59-61)

Result: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the adjudicating authority's order. (Paras 73)

Table of Content
1. overview of case background (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. appellant's arguments regarding impugned order (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. challenging jurisdiction of adjudicating authority (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. finality of approved resolution plan emphasized (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. position of respondent as secured creditor analyzed (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. court's findings on appellant's contentions (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
7. respondent's claim supported by existing liabilities (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
8. evidence of claims and charges reviewed (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
9. court's interpretation of statutory provisions (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
10. supreme court ruling on gvat and ibc (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
11. legal obligations and jurisdiction clarified (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
12. court's endorsement of existing law (Para 65 , 66 , 67)
13. final legal conclusion on the appeal (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
14. dismissal of appeal and closure of proceedings (Para 73)

JUDGMENT

(13th November, 2025)

INDEVAR PANDEY, MEMBER (T)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) by The Cosmos Co-operative Bank Ltd., the sole Financial Creditor and member of the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”) of Sterling Lam Limited (“the Corporate Debtor”). The appeal arises out of the impugned order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench (“Adjudicating Authority”) in IA No. 195(AHC)/2024 in CP (IB) No. 72 of 2018, whereby the Adjudicating Authority directed Shri Kailash T. Shah, Resolution Professional/ Respondent No. 1 to release an amount of Rs. 1,31,19,769.08 in favour of the Gujarat State Tax Department/ Respondent No.3 treating it as a secured creditor under Section 48 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (“GVAT Act”).

2. The said direction was passed while deciding I.A. No. 522 of 2021, an earlier application filed by the Resolution Professional seeking removal of the State Tax Department’s attachment over the properties of the Corporate Debtor, which had remained pending even after the approval of the Resolution Plan. Aggrieved by this order, the Appellant–Bank has approached this Appellate Tribunal contending that the Adjudicating Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying the distribution under an already approved and implemented Resolution Plan.

Brief facts of the case

3. Brief facts of the case are given below:

(i) CP (IB) 72/2018 was filed by Ramniklal S. Gosalia & Co. under Section 9 of the Code before the Adjudicating Authority seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Adjudicating Authority, vide its order dated 10.11.2020, admitted an application and appointed Mr. Rajendra Jain as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP).

(ii) On 20.11.2020, the IRP issued a public announcement inviting claims from the Creditors of the Corporate Debtor/Sterling Lam Limited.

(iii) Respondent No. 3/ Gujrat State Tax Department submitted its claim of Rs. 38,58,19,833/- on 01.12.2020, which was verified and admitted only to the extent of Rs. 3,37,65,975/- on 17.12.2020.

(iv) In the first CoC meeting held on 18.12.2020, Respondent No. 1, Mr. Kailash T. Shah, was appointed as Resolution Professional (RP), and his appointment was subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority on 10.02.2021.

(v) During verification of assets, the RP discovered that Respondent No. 3 had created encumbrances on the factory land of the Corporate Debtor at Village Mahiyal, Taluka Talod. On 27.04.2021, the RP addressed an email to Respondent No. 3 seeking removal of such encumbrances. The encumbrance was for a sum of Rs. 47,52,564 for the year 2014-15 including interest of a sum of Rs.2,31,84,958 for the year 2017-18 and sum of Rs. 1,05,81,017 for the year 2018-19.

(vi) In the 4th CoC meeting held on 28.04.2021, the RP apprised the members about the encumbrance created by the State Tax Depart

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top