Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial)
EMPLOYEE’S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION Regional P.F Commissioner, EPFO, RO Delhi – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SDU TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of provident fund legislation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the current appeals and their implications. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. tribunal's observations on limitation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments on the directory nature of limitation periods. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. final decision and order to reconsider the claims. (Para 24 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT
(Hybrid Mode)
[Per: Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial)]
The legislature of our country, for the purpose of providing the benefit of Provident Funds and Deposit-Linked Insurance to its employees who have been working in factories and establishments, had, by virtue of a Presidential Notification dated 04.03.1952, envisaged securing the future of employees working in such establishments and factories by extending provident fund and insurance benefits to them, so as to protect their future. This is why its object was later modified from time to time, having regard to the changed circumstances of industrial development in the country and to the law as per its needs due to industrial growth.
2. It provides that every establishment which is in the form of a factory or engaged in an industrial activity as specified in Schedule 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
