Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Ashok Bhushan, J
Supertech Ecociti Apartment Owners Association – Appellant
Versus
Hitesh Goel (IRP) of Supertech Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. associations seek maintenance handover post-registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 12) |
| 2. respondents oppose on procedural and completion grounds. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. rule 55 inapplicable to tribunal applications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. s.14(5) deems maintenance transfer to registered association. (Para 10 , 11 , 13) |
ORDER
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.
These two applications have been filed by M/s. Supertech Ecociti Apartment Owners Association and M/s. 34 Pavilion Apartment Owners Association in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins.) No. 406/2022 praying for certain directions. Notices were issued in the applications and reply has been filed, both by the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as well as the YG Estates Facilities Management Pvt. Ltd., the respondent No. 2 in the application.
2. We have heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for the IRP and learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. We proceed to notice the respective prayers and submissions made therein in following manner; I.A. No. 5459/2025
1. This application has been filed by Supertech Ecociti Apartment Owners Association praying for following reliefs:
“i. Direct handing over maintenance and IFMS charges to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
