SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 323

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) , Hon'ble Mr. Barun Mitra (Member (Technical)) ,
ABHAY JAIN DIRECTOR AND PROMOTER – Appellant
Versus
RKG FINVEST LIMITED – Respondent
1165/ND/2026 IA



NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 325 of 2026 &

I.A. No. 1165 of 2026 IN THE MATTER OF:

Abhay Jain Successful Resolution Applicant of Beans & More Hospitality Private LimitedAppellant Versus RKG Finvest Ltd. & Ors.Respondents Present:

For Appellant : Ms. Swarnika Aggarwal, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Preeti Kashyap, Mr. Ankit Sharma, Mr. Sahil Chawla and Mr. Pulkit Mehratia, Advocates.

O R D E R

(Hybrid Mode)

13.03.2026 : I.A. No. 1165/2026

1. This is an application praying for condonation of refiling of the appeal. 2. We find sufficient cause shown in the application for condonation of refiling delay.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no objection to the refiling delay.

Refiling delay is allowed.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for

the respondent.

2. This appeal has been filed against an order dated 19.08.2025, by which I.A., appellant has prayed for rectification/clarification of the order dated 12.06.2025. By order dated 12.06.2025, adjudicating authority has passed an order, where directions was granted, by which I.A. Liquidation 7/2024 was disposed of in the terms of the order. Under the said order, time frame was fixed for payment and directions were issued in paragraph xiv, which directions are as follows:

“xiv. In light of the above discussion the following directions are issued :

a. The SRA shall allocate and disburse the requisite amounts for payment to the Applicants/Financial Creditors as per the approved Resolution Plan within four (4) weeks from the date of this order.

b. The SRA and the Monitoring Committee shall submit a compliance Affidavit before this Adjudicating Authority within six (6) weeks regarding the allocation and disbursal of funds along with details of payments made to the Applicants/Financial Creditors as per the approved Resolution Plan.

c. Itis hereby also directed that in the event the SRA fails to implement the approved Resolution Plan, including but not limited to meeting its financial obligations towards the creditors as stipulated in the Resolution Plan, such non-compliance shall be construed as a material breach of the Resolution Plan and appropriate proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, shall be initiated.”

3. The application has been filed by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) which has been rejected by the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority noticed the observations made in the order 12.06.2025 and observed that the very same contentions are now been raised in the application, which were already dealt in the order dated 12.06.2025.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that appellant required the Loan Agreement from the financial creditor, when the said arguments were not accepted in the order dated 12.06.2025 there was no occasion to file any rectification application.

5. The application filed for rectification or clarification of the said order was wholly misconceived and has rightly been dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed.

[Justice Ashok Bhushan]

Chairperson [Barun Mitra]

Member (Technical)

himanshu/md

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top