Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Arun Baroka, Member (Technical)
Sanjeev Sangal – Appellant
Versus
Apex Heights Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of homebuyer claim and cirp (Para 1 , 43 , 44 , 91 , 92) |
| 2. rp's full admission of homebuyer's claim (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 73 , 74) |
| 3. sra's delay and refusal to implement plan (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. sra justifies verification due to provisional claims (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. sra alleges forgery; cash payments upheld (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 6. limited scope of verification clause in plan (Para 46 , 47 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 7. sra cannot resile from approved plan obligations (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 68 , 69) |
| 8. sra's due diligence required pre-plan submission (Para 81) |
| 9. suspicious sra-corporate debtor connections noted (Para 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 98) |
| 10. enforce plan implementation; verification lapses (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102) |
| 11. ibbi to investigate cirp conduct (Para 103) |
J U D G M E N T
(Hybrid Mode)
[Per: Arun Baroka, Member (Technical)]
1.The present Appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been filed against the Common Impugned Order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Na
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
