SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 717

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Hon'ble Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan (Member(Judicial)) , Hon'ble Mr. Naresh Salecha (Member (Technical)) ,
PARAMJEET SINGH SUSPENDED MANAGING DIRECTOR OSWAL OVERSEAS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
L H SUGAR FACTORIES LIMITED – Respondent
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1081 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sanjveev Sagar, Suhail Khan, Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Farid Ahmed Nizami, Vratika Mittal, Shobhit Sabharwal
For the Respondents: Mansumyer Singh, Mansij Arya, Neeraj Malhotra, Karan Luthra, Pratham Mehrotra, Nimish Gupta, Rohan Dua

An appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn when parties reach an amicable settlement, provided that the process for withdrawal of the insolvency application under Section 12A of the IBC is followed before the Adjudicating Authority.

Headnote:The matter involves an appeal filed by the suspended managing director of a corporate debtor against an order initiating corporate insolvency resolution process. The parties have entered into an amicable settlement, and a joint application was moved to dispose of the appeal in light of the settlement terms and the discharge of financial debt. The primary issue was the disposal of the appeal following a settlement and the modification of interim orders to allow the IRP to collate claims and constitute the Committee of Creditors (CoC) while staying the invitation of Expression of Interest (EOI) pending a Section 12A application before the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with directions regarding the IRP's limited actions pending the Section 12A application.

Table of Content
1. parties to an insolvency appeal may amicably settle and discharge financial debts to resolve the dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8)
2. procedural requirements for withdrawal under section 12a ibc include coc constitution and collation of claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. disposal of interlocutory applications upon the resolution of the main appeal. (Para 9)

O R D E R

(Hybrid Mode)

09.07.2026:

1. Heard Ld. Sr. Counsel for the appellant, Ld. Sr. Counsel for the Respondent No.1/FC, as well as Mr. Mansij Arya on behalf of the IRP/Respondent No.2. Perused the record.

2. IA No. 4288 of 2026 has been moved jointly by the appellant as well as the Respondent No. 1- LH Sugar Factories Ltd. (Financial Creditor) stating therein that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and in pursuance of the same the terms of the settlement has also been reduced in writing, a copy of which has been placed at page no. 8 to 13 of the above mentioned application.

3. If is further submitted that since the dispute has been amicably settled the appeal may be disposed of in pursuance of the same.

4. It is further submitted that this Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 24.06.2026 has passed an order directing the IRP not to take any further steps in pursuance of the impugned order till the next date of listing, however an application under Section 12A of the Code read with Regulation 30A of the CIRP Regulation, 2016 is required to be moved before the Ld. Adjudicating Authority through IRP and having regard to the recent amendments the matter is also required to be placed before the CoC and for that purpose the CoC is to be constituted after collating the claims. It is requested that the interim order dated 08.06.2026 may kindly modified to the extent that the IRP may collate the claim, constitute the CoC however may not proceed further for inviting Expression of Interest (EOI) till the disposal of Section 12A application by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority.

5. No objection in this regard has been raised by any of the Respondents.

6. Thus, having regard to the above facts and circumstances, the appeal filed by the appellant is dismissed as withdrawn with the direction that if any withdrawal application is filed by Respondent no. 1, financial creditor, the IRP may proceed further to constitute the CoC, after collating the claims but will not move further for inviting the EOI till the application filed under Section 12A of the Code is disposed of by Ld. Adjudicating Authority.

7. Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submits that in pursuance of the settlement taken place between the parties the demand draft no. 160850 drawn on IDFC First Bank dated 23.06.2026 of Rs. 2,80,00,000/- has already been handed over to the Respondent No. 1.

8. Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 admits that now the financial debt so far as the Respondent No. 1 is concerned has been discharged in full and final.

9. Aforesaid IA is also disposed of in above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top