SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 290

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Ajay Shankarlal Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvan Madan Resolution Professional – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:MZM LEGAL

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL

COURT-V, MUMBAI BENCH

123. IA/5712/2024 IA/5702/2024 C.P. (IB)/1245(MB)2021

IN THE MATTER OF

State Bank Of India

Vs

Arshiya Northern Ftwz Limited

U/s 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Order Delivered on 14.02.2025

CORAM:

MS. REETA KOHLI, MS. MADHU SINHA,

MEMBER (J) MEMBER (T)

Appearance:

For the Applicant:- Adv. Purnima Eapel (PH)

For the Respondent:

_______________________________________________________________

ORDER pending IAs i.e., IA 2365 of 2025 and IA 1822 of 2024. Filing of the present applications is unjustifiable as the same unnecessarily burdens the cause list of the Court which leaves the Court with little time to deal with the urgent matters. As the applicant could have made all the submissions in reply to the pending IAs

IA/5712/2024 & IA/5702/2024:- Adv. Purnima Eapel appearing for the Applicant submits that in view of the fact that they are not in receipt of all the documents therefore it is extremely difficult for the Applicant to file the reply in

Avoidance Application i.e. in IA 2365 of 2025 & in IA 1822 of 2024.

After having gone through the prayer made in the present Application, it is

evident that the reason given by the learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top