SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1316

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
K. Biswal, Member (Judicial), Manoj Kumar Dubey, Member (Technical)
Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited – Respondent
CP (IB) No.188/BB/2022



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Shri. Dhyan Chinnappa (Sr. Adv), Shri. Saurab Nikalje
For the Respondent: Shri. Dhananjay Joshi, Shri Abhijith Atur

The court established the date of default in insolvency proceedings as critical, affirming that defaults occurring during the exclusion period under Section 10A of the IBC bar any initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Application filed by Financial Creditor for initiation against Corporate Debtor due to default of Rs. 36,63,13,482/-; the Tribunal determined date of default relevant to the provisions under Section 10A as 15.09.2020, falling within the excluded period making the petition not maintainable. (Paras 24)

(B) Event of Default - Determination of - The Tribunal analyzed conditions under the Loan Agreement specifying events that constitute default, concluding that default conditions were met as per the agreement, reiterating that late payment could not redefine the date of default. (Paras 17-20)

Facts of the case:
An application was filed by Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited against Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited for initiating CIRP due to default on a loan amounting to Rs. 36,63,13,482/-. Following the determination of the default date as 15.09.2020 under Section 10A, the petition was declared non-maintainable.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the default occurred during the bar period specified under Section 10A of the IBC; hence, no application could be entertained.

Issues: Determination of maintainability under Section 10A concerning the date of default, implications of payment acknowledgment, and interpretation of loan agreement clauses.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal ruled that the date of default is substantiated by loan agreement criteria, rejecting attempts to shift it post acknowledgment of partial payments. Thus, any default during the specified exclusion period cannot lead to a maintainable petition.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petition filed concerning corporate insolvency. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 7 , 8)
2. court's findings on date of default and applicability of section 10a. (Para 2 , 6 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22)
3. argument regarding validity of creditor's claims. (Para 5 , 10 , 12)
4. final ruling on petition maintainability. (Para 24)

ORDER

Per : Manoj Kumar Dubey, Member (Technical)

1. The present petition is filed on 30.08.2022, under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity ‘IBC’/Code), r/w. Rule 4 of the I&B (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules 2016, by Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited inter alia seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited (for brevity ‘Corporate Debtor/Respondent’).

2. However, I.A No. 360 of 2023 was filed on 07.03.2023 by Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited seeking substitution of Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited with Omkara ARC and the Tribunal vide order dated 03.07.2023 allowed the I.A by substituting the name of ‘Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd’ ( for brevity ‘erstwhile Financial Creditor’ )with ‘Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd’ (for brevity ‘Applicant/Financial Creditor’) as the Financial Creditor of the Present Company Petition.

3. The facts of the case are discussed below:

a. The present application has been filed by the erstwhile Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor in respect of the default amount of Rs. 36,63,13,482/- (Rupees Thirty-Six Crores, Sixty-Three Lakhs, Thirteen Thousand, Four Hundred and Eighty-Two Only) as on 14.07.2022 together with the applicable interest, penal interest, charges.

b. It is submitted that Debt towards a project loan aggregating to INR 65,00,00,000/- (Rupees Sixty-Five Crores Only) was sanctioned by DHFL in favour of the Corporate Debtor. Sanction Letter dated 22.05.2017 was addressed by DHFL in favour of the Corporate Debtor wherein the total principal amount OF Rs. 65,00,00,000/- was sanctioned by the Financial Creditor and further Loan agreement dated 26.05.2017 was executed between DHFL and the Corporate Debtor.

c. Further, in terms of the sanction letter and the Loan agreement, the erstwhile Financial Creditor, sanctioned financial assistance up to Rs. 65,00,00,000/- as per the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement and the ancillary documents executed. Pursuant to the loan agreement the amount was disbursed in the following manner:

Sr.DateDisbursement
0130.05.2017INR 460000000
0205.06.2017INR 20000000
0312.07.2017INR 50000000
0413.12.2017INR 30000000
0523.02.2018INR 10000000
0616.03.2018INR 40000000
0712.06.2018INR 20000000
0808.01.2019INR 19500000

d. Subsequent to the disbursement of loan amount by the erstwhile Financial Creditor, the Corporate Debtor failed to adhere to the terms of the Loan Agreement and defaulted in making repayments. Thereafter, the Financial Creditor addressed a Demand Notice dated 29.06.2021 to the Corporate Debtor and the Personal Guarantors calling upon them to repay the outstanding amount of Rs. 30,88,46,973/- as on 11.06.2021 together with other charges and interest accured till the date of the Loan closure within 7 (seven) days from the receipt of the Demand Notice.

e. It is submitted that despite receipt of the demand notice, the Corporate Debtor failed to repay the outstanding amounts and thus the date of default is 08.07.2021 i.e., expiry date of Demand Notice period of 7 days from the receipt of notice. It is clarified by the Applicant that the date of default as per NeSL Report is 15.09.2020, however last part payment was received until 02.02.2021.

f. It is submitted that Post receipt of the Legal Notice dated 29.06.2021, the Corporate Debtor has neither made any payment nor has disputed its liabilities pursuant to the Legal Notice.

4. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent filed its objection stating as under:

a. It is submitted that the Corporate Debtor entered into a Loan Agr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top