Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE, SHRI. D. ARVIND, JJ
Mr. Mukesh Goel – Appellant
Versus
CA Santanu Brahma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the application initiated by the suspended promoter under cirp. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 12 , 15) |
| 2. cirp initiation details and requirements for msme promoters. (Para 7 , 10 , 11 , 17) |
| 3. legal provisions regarding msme promoter exemptions in insolvency. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. final decision on eligibility criteria and eoi submissions. (Para 26 , 28) |
ORDER
PER Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial)
1. This Court is congregated through hybrid mode.
2. Heard the Learned Counsels for both parties.
Brief in nutshell:
3. This instant application has been preferred by Mr. Mukesh Goel, Suspended Promoter of Aanchal Ispat Ltd (under CIR Process) against CA Santanu Brahma, the Respondent Professional of the Corporate Debtor, Aanchal Ispat Ltd. and the Committee of Creditor of the Corporate Debtor, Aanchal Ispat Ltd. under Section 60 (5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 , for brevity “I&B Code” seeking the following direction from this Adjudicating Authority as under:
a. An order be passed directing the Respondents to relax and/or dispense with the eligibility criteria in respect of the Applicant herein in submitting the EoI pursuant to the In C.P. (IB) No. 1518/KB/20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
