SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1276

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Dr. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula, J, Shri Charan Singh, T
Ardee Hitech Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Bevcon Wayors Pvt Ltd – Respondent
IA (IBC) 1408/2023 | CP(IB) No.493/9/HDB/2018



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Rajnish Sinha
For the Respondents: Raja Shekar Rao Salvaji

The liquidator's partial acceptance of a claim due to lack of supporting documents is valid, affirming the need for proper evidence in disputed insolvency claims.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9 and 42 - Corporate Debtor’s failure to comply with contractual obligations leading to rejection of claim - Partial acceptance by Liquidator based on available records deemed valid - Need for proper documentation highlighted for disputed claims. (Paras 1, 10, 12, 13)

(B) Claims and liquidator's duty - Liquidator is not an adjudicatory authority to settle previous disputes - The necessity for sufficient supporting documents emphasized. (Paras 2.1, 11, 14)

Facts of the case:
An operational creditor filed an application challenging the partial acceptance of their claim amount by the liquidator. The claim was significantly reduced due to a lack of supporting documents and timely submissions.

Findings of Court:
The liquidator’s decision to allow only a part of the claim was supported by the records available, and the requirement for proper evidence for disputed claims was reiterated.

Issues: Whether the partial allowance of the claim by the liquidator with no adequate justification warrants interference by the Tribunal?

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the liquidator acted within his authority when accepting partial claims based on available documentation, underscoring the importance of proper evidential support for claims. The claim submitted by the applicant was deemed premature without proper adjudication.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. operational creditor's claim significantly reduced due to incomplete documentation. (Para 1)
2. liquidator's authority to assess claims based on documented evidence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. decision on claims rooted in procedural compliance and evidentiary support. (Para 14)
4. final dismissal of application regarding the claim. (Para 15)

ORDER

This Application is filed challenging the communication of the liquidator dated 14.11.2022 whereby the liquidator has accepted a mere sum of INR 2,35,762/- i.e., constituting a mere 0.09% of the total of INR 23,83,15,026/- claimed amount and sought a direction to the Respondent/Liquidator to consider, verify, and accept the entire claimed amount in conformity with the agreement executed on 01.11.2018, as endorsed by the Corporate Debtor.

1) Brief of averment in the Application:

1.1 That, the Applicant is a Public Limited company duly incorporated under the Provisions of the companies act, 1956, situated in Odisha, that is engaged in providing marine logistic service and onshore direct berthing operations of various size vessels. That, the applicant floated a tender dated 14.09.2018 for the purpose of carrying out project in the nature of an ‘Engineering, Procurement and Construction of Material Handling System at the Gopalpur Port, Odisha’. The Corporate Debtor being the Successful bidder, was awarded the project vide agreement dated 01.11.2018 for a sum of Rs. 27,75,00,001/-. An additional variation for supply was awarded on 25.07.2019, hence, increasing the total contract price to Rs. 28,07,07,835/-.

1.2 That, soon after the commencement of the project, the Corporate Debtor committed various breaches and failed to honour the terms of the contract. As per clause 8.2 of the Agreement dated 25.07.2019, the Corporate Debtor was supposed to complete the entire project within 9 months from the date of commencement i.e., 01.11.2018 till the last date i.e., 31.07.2019. That, due to the delay caused by the Corporate Debtor and failure to complete the project in time, the Applicant suffered massive losses.

1.3 That, as per clause 14.2 of the Agreement, an amount of Rs. 5,55,00,000/- was released by the Applicant as mobilization advance, which was to be recovered through proportionate deductions made from the R.A. Bills and Interim Payment Application. The applicant was only able to recover an amount of Rs. 45,09,566/-. That due the failure to complete the project by 31.07.2019, the applicant’s representative for the Project vide Letter dated 03.08.2019 sent a notice seeking the liquidated damages for the delay in completion as per Clause 8.7 that become due and payable.

1.4 That, the Applicant always adhered to the terms of the Agreement and performed its part of the obligations by making timely payments to the Corporate Debtor. However, the Corporate Debtor miserably failed to adhere to its contractual obligations and timelines under the agreement, resulting in the applicant pay in excess over and above the Agreement making the Corporate Debtor liable to refund the same. The details of the said payment are extracted in the table below;

ParticularsAmount (in Rs)
Original Contract Price27,75,00,001
Additional Variation Order32,07,834
Total (A)28,07,07,835
Amount paid by the Applicant to the Corporate Debtor
15% advance payment received after TDS4,09,19,490
5% BG payment received after TDS1,36,39,830
Deposit after deduction of TDS on billing53,64,872
Direct payment of RA Bills and Escrow payments to Sub-Vendors27,86,83,096
Total33,86,07,288
Less: Advance recovered from Corporate Debtor’s account45,09,566
Less: Retention amount deducted from Corporate Debtor’s account11,27,392
Total (B)33,29,70,330
Excess Amount paid by the Applicant over and above the Agreement (A-B)5,22,62,495

1.5 That, during May-June 2022, it came into the knowledge of the applicant that an application under section 9 of the Code, 2016 bearing CP(IB) No. 493/9/HDB/2018, was admitted vide order dated 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top