NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
SMT. BIDISHA BANERJEE, SHRI D. ARVIND, JJ
Century Aluminium Manufacturing Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Religare Finvest Limited – Respondent
Per: D. Arvind, Member (Technical)
1. The Court is convened through hybrid mode.
2. Learned Sr. Counsel/Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties were heard at length.
3. This is an application, i.e., IA (I.B.C)/542(KB)2024 preferred by Century Aluminium Manufacturing Company Limited (“Applicant”/ “Corporate Debtor”) against Religare Finvest Limited “Respondent”/ “Financial Creditor”) seeking following relief(s), inter alia: -
4. Factual matrix of the case is as under: - a) A loan agreement dated 14.09.2015 was executed by and between the Applicant and Respondent. The loan agreement contained an arbitration clause at Clause 20. P a g e 3 | 18 b) As the Applicant defaulted in re-payment of loan, the Respondent issued a recall notice and notice of invoca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.