SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 817

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Lakshmi Gurung, Charanjeet Singh Gulati, JJ
Madhukar Anantrao Pathak – Appellant
Versus
MPTA Limited – Respondent
CA No. 129 of 2024 | IA No. 82 of 2024 | CP No. 64/MB/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Adv. Akshay Petkar, Adv. Pranav Shah, Adv. Aditya Hegde
For the Respondents: Adv. Nausher Kohli, Adv. Amir Arsiwala, i/b Sneha Herwade

The Tribunal held that the sale of an asset does not require a special resolution under the Companies Act if the asset is not classified as an 'undertaking'.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 180(1)(a) - Sale of asset - Sale of Saakar Bungalow Property by MPTA to Buttepatil Properties - No special resolution passed prior to sale - Tribunal ruled that the property was not an undertaking and thus, no special resolution was needed - Sale deemed valid. (Paras 32, 49, 68)

(B) SARFAESI Act, 2002 - Section 13(2) - MPTA defaulted on loan, necessitated sale of asset to repay Axis Bank - Tribunal observed that the sale was executed to prevent distress sale. (Paras 10, 37, 68)

Facts of the case:
MPTA faced financial distress with Axis Bank, prompting the sale of its Sakar Bungalow Property without a special resolution, contested by minority shareholders as undervalued.

Findings of Court:
Sale upheld as valid based on law and necessity to clear debts, with sufficient procedural compliance and documentation.

Issues: Whether the sale violated Section 180 of the Companies Act and if the property value was adequately assessed.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal interpreted 'undertaking' under the Companies Act, establishing that the sold property was an asset, not an undertaking, thus no special resolution was required.

Result: C.A. 129/2024 dismissed; IA 82/2024 granted.

Table of Content
1. background of the ownership and sale of property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioners challenge validity of the sale based on alleged legal violations. (Para 10 , 11)
3. responses and submissions from mpta and buttepatil regarding the sale. (Para 12 , 13)
4. court's observations on procedural history and sale legality. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. legal interpretation of section 180 of companies act, 2013. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
6. court's interpretation concerning the definition of undertaking versus asset. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
7. court finds sale does not require special resolution. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
8. effect of title protection on sale legality. (Para 50 , 51 , 52)
9. evaluation of sale price and market value issues. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
10. validity of publication process for sale. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
11. court dismisses claims of collusion and illegitimacy in sale process. (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67)
12. final ruling on the sale's validity. (Para 68)

Per: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial)

Brief Background Facts

1. M/s MPTA Limited (hereinafter referred to asMPTA) is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and was the owner of two assets being (i) Office Space of MPTA with office furniture at Kunal Plaza, 2nd Floor, Chinchwad Station, Pune, Maharashtra – 411019 and (ii) Land bearing Final Plot No. 887A/21, (TPS-1, Bhamburda, Pune), corresponding to City S. No. 1206A/118 as per Index II i.e. City S. No. 1206/18A as per property register card admeasuring 446.16 sq. mts. carved out of S. No. 19 A/6, and S. No. 192/2, together with an old two- story residential building constructed thereon admeasuring 366.02 sq. mts. built up (inclusive of garage), situated at village Bhamburda (Shivaji Nagar) of City of Pune titled as ‘Sakar Bungalow’ (hereinafter referred to as theSakar Bungalow Property/the said Property).

2. One group of directors who are also shareholders of MPTA holding 49.90% share capital, who are the Applicants in CA 129/2024, (herein after referred to as the Petitioners) had filed Company Petition No. 64/2022 (the Petition) on 22.12.2021 under section 130, 210-213 read with 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 against MPTA, other directors and other persons connected thereto.

3. Vide order dated 28.03.2022, this Tribunal, directed to maintain Status Quo with respect to the assets and shareholding of MPTA.

4. In the meantime, Axis Bank, a secured financial creditor, having security interest in the properties of MPTA, issued notice dated 04.05.2023 to MPTA under section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). Pursuant thereto, MPTA decided to sell the property for repaying the loan of Axis Bank and therefore filed IA/110/2023 for vacation of the status quo order and to permit MPTA to sell its assets.

5. The matter was briefly heard on 30.06.2023 but no relief was granted as opportunity was given to the other side to file reply. Thereafter on 18.08.2023, the status-quo qua the properties of MPTA was vacated. Aggrieved by the said order, the Petitioners filed appeal bearing Company Appeal (AT) No. 196 of 2023 before Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (Appellate Tribunal) on 29.09.2023.

6. Proceedings before Hon’ble NCLAT

i. During the pendency of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal, Sakar Bungalow Property was sold to Buttepatil Properties (Buttepatil), which is a registered partnership firm, vide Sale Deed dated 09.11.2023 for sale consideration of Rs. 9.5 crores after obtaining “No Objection Certificate” from Axis Bank and it is undisputed that the entire sale consideration has been paid to Axis Bank.

ii. When the Petitioners became aware of the sale of the Sakar Bungalow Property, they filed two Applications before Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal being

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top