SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1662

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
SHRI JYOTI KUMAR TRIPATI, SHRI RAVICHANDRAN RAMASAMY, JJ
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Mr. S. Ashok – Respondent
IBA/614/2020



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. M L Ganesh
For the Respondent: Mr.P J Rishikesh, P J Sri Ganesh

The personal guarantor's liability is co-extensive with that of the corporate debtor under the Indian Contract Act, and the application for insolvency resolution was timely filed.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 95(1) - Personal Guarantor - Application for initiation of insolvency resolution process against personal guarantor of corporate debtor - Financial Creditor established the default of payment and recommended initiation of process - The application is within the period of limitation as the default date is 06.03.2019 and the application was filed on 26.10.2020. (Paras 11.7 and 11.9)

(B) Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 128 - Liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor - The personal guarantor’s liability is independent and ensures recovery from either the principal debtor or the surety. (Para 11.8)

Facts of the case:
The Financial Creditor filed a petition against the Personal Guarantor for initiating insolvency resolution process due to default in repayment of loans by the Corporate Debtor, MPL Cars Private Limited, amounting to Rs.36,50,28,970/-.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found that the requirements under Section 95 of the IBC were satisfied and allowed the application for insolvency resolution process against the Personal Guarantor.

Issues: The main issue was whether the application for insolvency resolution process was filed within the limitation period and the liability of the Personal Guarantor.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the personal guarantor's liability is co-extensive with that of the corporate debtor and the application for insolvency resolution process was timely.

Result: The Insolvency Resolution Process stands initiated against Mr. S. Ashok.

Table of Content
1. application for insolvency resolution process filed within limitation. (Para 1 , 5)

ORDER

(Hearing through hybrid mode

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‚Code/IBC, 2016") r/w Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 by State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as ‚Financial Creditor‛) for initiating insolvency resolution process against Mr. Ashok (hereinafter referred to as ‚Personal Guarantor‛) of MPL Cars Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‚Corporate Debtor‛).

2. This Tribunal vide order dated 13.08.2019 in CP/855/IB/2018 admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP and subsequently vide order dated 12.07.2024 into Dissolution.

3. Part – I of the application shows the details of the SBI/ Financial Creditor. The registered address is located at SBI, Stressed Asset Management Branch, Red Cross Building, Montieh Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

4. Part-II of the application shows the details of the Personal Guarantor. The Personal Guarantor/ Respondent stood as a personal guarantor in respect of the loans availed by MPL Cars Private Limited. The address of the Personal Guarantor / Respondent is Mr.S.Ashok, S/o Mr. N. Singaravelu, F1 Abul Regency, 1st Floor, No.6, Southmada Street, Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai– 600 015.

5. Part – III of the application shows that the SBI/ Financial Creditor has given the value of total debt as Rs.36,50,28,970/- (Rupees Thirty six Crore fifty lakh twenty eight thousand and nine seventy only) covering Principal amount together with interest as on 07.10.2020 and the Date of Default is specified as 06.03.2019.

6. Part – IV of the Application gives the details of the Resolution Professional and the SBI/ Financial Creditor has proposed Mr. V Sadhasivam as the Insolvency Resolution Professional in respect of the Personal Guarantor/ Respondent.

7. Financial Creditors Submissions

7.1 SBI/Financial Creditor submitted that it had advanced cash credit loan facilities by means of e-DFS (Electronic Dealer Finance Scheme) to a tune of Rs.35 Crores vide sanction letter dated 25.01.2012 to the Corporate Debtor company namely M/s. MPL Cars Private Limited. On 05.12.2012, the Corporate Debtor was sanctioned with adhoc additional Cash Credit e-DFS to a tune of Rs.7 crores.

7.2 It is submitted that Corporate Debtor has sought for renewal of existing credit facility and the same was renewed at an existing level on 03.12.2013. On 28.04.2015 the Financial Creditor, after taking into the consideration the financial position of the Corporate Debtor, renewed the credit facility and accordingly reduced the limit from Rs.35 Crores to Rs.25 Crores.

7.3 On 30.09.2015 the SBI has again sanctioned a temporary loan facility of Rs.5 Crores for a period of three months for purchasing new vehicle models as per the Corporate Debtor’s request letter dated 22.09.2015. The Corporate Debtor’s concerned credit facility account has become inactive from 26.11.2015 due to non-routing of sale proceeds of Nov 2015 to SBI e-DFS Account. The Corporate Debtor has also failed to repay the Adhoc amount of Rs.5 Crores supposed to be paid before 31.12.2015. On 07.05.2016, vide a sanction letter Financial Creditor has reduced the existing credit facilities by reducing the limit from Rs.30 Crores to Rs.25 Crores subject to specific condition of bringing the collateral security.

7.4 The Corporate Debtor has offered an immovable property belonging to the Personal Guarantor/ Respondent, Mr. S Ashok as collateral security by creating an equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds which was executed on 19.05.2016 and registered as Doc. No. 1655/2016 with SRO Mylapore.

7.5 It is submitted that, despite several opportunities given, the Corporate Debtor neither revamp the business operations, nor has repaid the sal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top