SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2115

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
VAISHALI PATRIKAR RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL SATRA PROPERTIES INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR NIGAM JODHPUR (NORTH) – Respondent
IA(I.B.C) - 3792/2022



Advocates:
For the Petitioner:AMIT TUNGARE

Under Section 60(5) of Insolvency &

Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Satra Properties India Limited

…Applicant

V/s

Nagar Nigam Jodhpur (North)

…Respondent

In the matter of

C.P.(IB) No. 1632/MB/2019

Vistra ITCL (India) Limited

Financial Creditor

Vs.

M/s Satra Properties India Limited

Corporate Debtor

Order delivered on: 02.04.2024

Coram:

Shri Prabhat Kumar Justice Shri V.G. Bisht

Hon’ble Member (Technical) Hon’ble Member (Judicial)

Appearances

C.P.(IB) No. 1632/MB/2019 For the RP : Mr. Pulkit Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : None

ORDER

Per: Prabhat Kumar, Member (Technical)

1. This Application IA 3792/2022 is filed under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 by Satra Properties India Limited (“Applicant”) in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) of M/s Satra Properties (India) Limited (“Corporate Debtor”), seeking following reliefs:

a. Be pleased to direct the Respondent and its office to remove the seal on all the assets and properties of the Corporate Debtor, b. Be pleased to direct the Respondent to release the attachment on all the assets and properties of the Corporate Debtor and hand over the charge to the Applicant/Resolution Professional;

2. That by virtue of order dated 03rd August 2020 as passed by this Tribunal, the CIRP was initiated against the Corporate Debtor and one Mr. Devarajan Raman was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor. Mr. Devarajan Raman was later confirmed as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor by majority of the members of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

2.1. That after the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, the Respondent addressed a letter dated 28th November 2020 to the Corporate Debtor calling upon the Corporate Debtor to pay city development tax amounting to Rs. 13,03,231/-

C.P.(IB) No. 1632/MB/2019

2.2. That immediately thereafter the erstwhile Resolution Professional addressed an email dated 1 December 2020 informing the office of the Respondent about the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor and moratorium as per Section 14 of the Code

2.3. That office of the Respondent addressed a letter dated 12 May

2022 [Ref No. 2199] to the Corporate Debtor hereby calling upon the Corporate Debtor to repay an amount of Rs.

15,96,834/-

2.4. That the office of the Respondent has attached the assets belonging to the Corporate Debtor on 13th May 2022 as part of certain proceedings initiated by the office of the Respondent against the Corporate Debtor.

2.5. That immediately thereafter, the erstwhile Resolution Professional addressed an email dated 13th May 2022 to the Respondent once again informing about the initiation of CIRP and further stating that the sealing of the property by the Respondent is illegal and attracts the provisions of contempt as the Respondent has violated this NCLT order dated 03 August

2020.

2.6. That the Applicant is appointed as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor by this Hon'ble NCLT vide order dated 22 September 2022.

2.7. That after the appointment of the Applicant as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor, the Applicant addressed a letter dated 07th November 2022 by giving reference to the letter no. 2199 of the Respondent. The Applicant intimated the Respondent about initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, imposition of moratorium and appointment of the C.P.(IB) No. 1632/MB/2019 Applicant as the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor

2.8. That the Applicant has also made intimation of taking the custody of the property of the Corporate Debtor under Section

25(2)(a) of IBC.

3. Heard learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

3.1. This Application have been filed challenging the letter dated

12.05.2022 written by the Commissioner Nagar Nigam Jodhpur to Revenue Officer u/s 131(1) and 133(3) of Rajasthan Nagar Palika Adhiniyam, 2009 for execution of Demand Notice.

3.2. On 26.10.2023, the Applicant was directed to i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top