SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2162

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Shri.Prabhat Kumar Justice V.G Bisht, J
Air Wave Technocrafts Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Voltas Limited – Respondent
CP (IB) 939/MB/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Vishal Agarwal, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Avinash Joshi, Adv.

The court ruled that claims for operational debt were time-barred due to incorrect acknowledgment of default and lack of supporting documentation, emphasizing adherence to limitation laws.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Petition filed by Operational Creditor for non-payment of operational debt dismissed due to lack of valid acknowledgment and time-barred invoices. The claim was based on invoices from 2010 to 2019, with the date of default incorrectly stated as 11.08.2022, which does not comply with limitation laws. (Paras 40, 41)

Facts of the case:
The Operational Creditor filed a petition for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor for unpaid operational debt of Rs. 1,51,12,342.00, which included principal and interest. The Corporate Debtor denied liability, claiming the debt was time-barred and lacked supporting documentation. (Paras 1-3)

Findings of Court:
The petition was dismissed as the invoices were deemed individually barred by limitation, with no valid acknowledgment of debt. The Operational Creditor failed to provide necessary documentation to support claims. (Paras 40, 41)

Issues: The primary issues included the validity of the claimed debt, acknowledgment of invoices, and the applicability of limitation laws to the claims made. (Paras 40, 41)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the date of default must align with the first invoice due date, and individual invoices were independently subject to limitation. The Operational Creditor did not provide sufficient evidence to support the claims. (Paras 40, 41)

Result: The petition was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. initiation of cirp and operational debt details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. operational creditor's claims and payment history. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. corporate debtor's defenses against the claims. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
4. further disputes and acknowledgment by corporate debtor. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
5. court's analysis on limitation and validity of claims. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

ORDER

1. This Petition CP (IB) 939/MB/2024 is filed by Air Wave Technocrafts Private Limited (hereinafter referred as ‘Applicant’/ ‘Operational Creditor’) under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity ‘the Code/IBC’) seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) against Voltas Limited (hereinafter referred as ‘Respondent’/ ‘Corporate Debtor’) for non- payment of total Operational Debt of Rs. 1,51,12,342.00/- (Rupees One Crore Fifty-One lacs twelve Thousand Three Hundred Forty-Two only), along with interest at the rate of 12% P.a. The Interest thereon calculated w.e.f. 27.12.2021.

2. The principal amount is Rs. 1,20,46,835.00 /- (Rupees Three Crore Fifty-Four Lakh Sixty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-Two Only), and with simple interest of Rs. 30,65,507.00/- (Rupees Thirty Lacs Sixty-Five Thousand Five Hundred Seven only).

3. The date of default, as per Part IV of the Application, is 11.08.2022. Submissions made by the Operational Creditor/Petitioner:

4. The Operational Creditor is a Company, incorporated under• the Companies Act, 1956 and is a registered under MSME.

5. The applicant provided services of operation and maintenance of HVAC Systems at the sites

6. The Corporate Debtor approached the Operational Creditor requesting for the services to be made at the sites of the various client of the Corporate Debtor, for which running account is maintained with the Corporate Debtor and invoices have been raised and paid since 2010 until 2019.

7. The amount of operational debt of Rs. 1,20,46,835.00 fell due against various unpaid Bills raised for the services rendered by the applicant to the clients of the Corporate Debtor, for which the payments have already been realised by the Corporate Debtor from its clients. After multiple mails and reminders, on 11.08.2022, the Corporate Debtor arbitrarily denied the payments of unpaid invoices and therefore, considered to have committed default. The Corporate debtor confirmed the part payment of Rs. 15.03 lac towards full and final settlement on 22.12.2022.

8. The last invoice was raised on 07.01.2019, and the Corporate Debtor continued to make part payments.

9. Due to pending unpaid invoices, the Operational Creditor pursued regular follow-ups. On 14.08.2020, the Corporate Debtor informed that the matter had been forwarded to its commercial team for verification.

10. A payment of Rs. 7,81,313.28 was received on 18.02.2021 towards the outstanding operational dues.

11. The Corporate Debtor, through email dated 11.08.2022, dishonestly denied further payments citing alleged non-compliance and non- availability of records. This denial is considered as the date of default under the Code.

12. Despite the earlier denial, the Corporate Debtor acknowledged a part payment and proposed a full and final settlement of Rs. 15.03 lakhs on 22.12.2022, without addressing the remaining claims.

13. The Operational Creditor registered the debt with the Information Utility on 13.02.2023 and re-submitted it on 19.06.2023, prompting NeSL to email the Corporate Debtor for confirmation, which went unanswered.

14. Continuous email correspondences regarding outstanding invoices and reminders were sent, and replies were received acknowledging the issue or seeking commercial verification.

15. On 17.02.2024, a Demand Notice in Form-3 was sent via email on 18.02.2024. The Corporate Debtor vide its reply dated 01.03.2024 has denied its liability raising certain disputes and also the limitatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top