NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
SHRI UMESH KUMAR SHUKLA, SHRI KISHORE VEMULAPALLI, JJ
Bank of Baroda – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Rayapati Sambasiva Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under ibc for pirp. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the financial transactions and defaults. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. resolution professional's report and recommendations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. objections to rp report by respondent no.1. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
ORDER
PER: BENCH
The present Petition has been filed, vide Diary No.416 dated 01.04.2024, by Bank of Baroda (hereinafter referred to as the “Petitioner” or “Financial Creditor”) through its Chief Manager, Mr. Thamarai Selvan, who has authorisation letter dated 22.11.2018, under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (herein after referred to as the “IBC” or “Code”) read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtor) Rules, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the “Personal Guarantors Rules”) seeking to initiate Personal Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as the “PIRP”) against Mr. Rayapati Sambasiva Rao (hereinafter referred to as the “Respondent No.1” or “Personal Guarantor”), who is the Personal Guarantor



Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.