SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3117

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
MANNI SANKARIAH SHANMUGA SUNDARAM, ATUL CHATURVEDI, JJ
PRUDENT ARC LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KARAN AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
Company Petition CP (IB)/60/ND/2023 | Restored Company Petition (IBC)/22/ND/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sumeet Raj, Mr. Siddharth Shankar, Ms. Akanksha, Mr. Sharique Ajmal
For the Respondents: Mr. Rishabh Arora

The court clarified that debts linked to supply chain transactions are operational debts, not financial debts, thus rendering insolvency applications under Section 7 of the IBC non-maintainable.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Corporate insolvency resolution process - Application filed by Financial Creditor against Corporate Debtor for repayment default of ₹3,17,64,312/- - Corporate Debtor contended that transaction was tied to supply chain financing and thus, constituted operational debt instead of financial debt - Adjudicating Authority found that the arrangement was fundamentally linked to operational obligations, maintaining that the current application was not maintainable under the code. (Paras 1, 19)

(B) Legal character of debts - The differentiation between financial debt and operational debt was emphasized, clarifying that the financing extended was tied to supplies and not for time value of money. (Paras 12-19)

Facts of the case:
An insolvency application was preferred by Prudent ARC Limited, asserting default of repayment from Karan Automotives Private Limited. The financing was articulated through a tripartite agreement involving a Non-Banking Financial Company, directly tied to supply transactions.

Findings of Court:
The Adjudicating Authority ruled that the claim arose from an operational debtor relationship, thus dismissing the petition as not maintainable under Section 7.

Issues: The central issue revolved around the classification of debt as operational rather than financial, and whether the petition filed was maintainable under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that financing arrangements constituting operational debt cannot be classified under financial debt as they were inherently linked to a supply chain transaction.

Result: Application under Section 7 was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. insolvency application filed under ibc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of financial transaction and agreements. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. cirp initiation against corporate debtor. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. courts evaluate the nature of financial arrangements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court ruled petition not maintainable. (Para 18 , 19)

ORDER

PER: MANNI SANKARIAH SHANMUGA SUNDARAM, MEMBER (J)

1. The present Company Application is filed by PRUDENT ARC LIMITED (‘Applicant’) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity ‘the Code’) read with rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 (for brevity ‘the Rules’) with the following prayer with a prayer to trigger Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Respondent Company Karan Automotives Private Limited (‘Corporate Debtor’) for default in repayment of financial debt of Rs.3,17,64,312/- (Rupees Three Crores Seventeen Lakhs Sixty Four Thousand Three Hundred Twelve Only).

2. PRUDENT ARC LIMITED (PRUDENT TRUST 58/22) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Financial Creditor’ / ‘Applicant’) is an Asset Reconstruction Company, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and registered as Securitisation and Asset Reconstruction Company pursuant to Section 3 of SARFAESI Act, 2022 . The authorised officer of Financial Creditor Sh. Amar Jit Kochar has been empowered and authorised to sign, file and verify the present application vide Board Resolution dated 17.06.2021.

3. The Corporate Debtor i.e., Karan Automotives Private Limited having CIN: U34300DL200PTC118971 was incorporated on 14.02.2003 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office situated at H.No. 7, Ground Floor ,Vill. Tekhand Mavi Mohalla, 1 E, Campa Cola Factory New Delhi New Delhi 110020. Since the registered Page | 2 office of the Corporate Debtor is in New Delhi, this Tribunal having territorial jurisdiction over the NCT of Delhi is the Adjudicating Authority in relation to the prayer for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of respondent corporate debtor under sub-section (1) of Section 60 of the Code.

4. Briefly stated facts of the case as mentioned in the Company Application, which are relevant to the issue in question, are as follows:-

a) That the present insolvency application is preferred by Prudent ARC Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "Financial Creditor" or "Assignee" or "applicant"), under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the "Code"), seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP") against Karan Automotives Private Limited. It is submitted that the Financial Creditor is a private limited company under the Companies Act, 2013 and is also registered as an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ("SARFAESI Act").

b) That UGRO Capital Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Ugro" or "Assignor") is a leading Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), which had originally sanctioned and disbursed the loan facility to the Corporate Debtor, pursuant to execution of various agreements, sanction letters and related documentation. That subsequently, by way of an Assignment Deed dated 29.09.2021, Page | 3 Ugro (Assignor) transferred and assigned the entire debt, along with all underlying rights, interests, entitlements and security documents, including the right to initiate legal proceedings and take all necessary actions in respect of recovery of the said financial debt from the Corporate Debtor, in favour of Prudent (Assignee).

c) The Applicant submitted that Ugro (Assignor), vide Sanction Letter dated 07.10.2019, sanctioned a loan facility with a credit limit of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores only) in favour of the Corporate Debtor, whereby the Corporate Debtor was entitled to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top