SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 3393

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Shri Anil Raj Chellan, MEMBER (TECHNICAL), Shri K.R. Saji Kumar, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Madhvi Munshi – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar of Companies, Mumbai – Respondent
COMP. APPL. NO. 68 OF 2025 | APPEAL NO. 31/MB/2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant: CA Ankit Pitti
For the Respondents:

The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of conducting public auctions for company assets to ensure transparency and maximize returns, rejecting private sale due to inadequate advertisement.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Section 290 - NCLT Rules, 2016 - Application for private sale of company property - Liquidator sought approval for the sale of immovable property after failed public auctions - Tribunal directed fresh public auction due to inadequate advertisement and responses - Emphasis on adherence to prior orders regarding auction methods. (Paras 1, 3.6)

(B) Powers of Company Liquidator - The Company Liquidator has the authority to sell company assets subject to Tribunal's directions, ensuring transparency and fairness in the sale process. (Paras 3.2)

Facts of the case:
The liquidator of Shramik Multitrade Private Limited sought approval for a private sale after multiple failed public auctions for the company's sole asset, a property in Mumbai. The highest offer received was below the liquidation value.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal found insufficient advertisement for the auctions and directed a new public auction to ensure fair market value is achieved.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the private sale could be approved given the lack of interest in public auctions and the need for adequate advertising.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal ruled that the sale must be conducted transparently through public auction to maximize returns for creditors, emphasizing the need to adhere to previous orders regarding auction processes.

Result: Private sale disallowed; fresh public auction ordered.

Table of Content
1. application for sale of company property. (Para 1 , 2)

ORDER

1. This IA has been filed under Section 290 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 by the Liquidator of Shramik Multitrade Private Limited (in Liquidation) seeking approval for sale of Office No.301, 3rd Floor, Continuum Tower, Ram Mandir Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai-400057, admeasuring 525 Sq. Ft. (said Property) through Private sale to Mr. Divyesh Dagliya.

2. Background

2.1 The Shramik Multitrade Private Limited (Company) was admitted into the Winding Up Process vide order of this Tribunal dated 13.01.2023 and appointed the Applicant as Company Liquidator. The Company was allotted the said Property in lieu of the flat previously owned by the Company prior to redevelopment. After receiving possession of the said Property, the Applicant, with the approval of the winding-up committee, put the said Property up for public auction as per the auction notice dated 19.12.2024, for a reserve price of Rs. 1,71,15,000/-. Since there was no Expression of Interest, the 2nd auction was conducted on 13.01.2025 for a reserve price of Rs. 1,54,03,500/-. Again, the 3rd public auction was conducted pursuant to the auction notice dated 10.02.2025 for a reserve price of Rs. 1,54,03,500/-. The Applicant did not receive any Expression of Interest even for the 3rd auction conducted on 10.02.2025.

2.2 In the circumstances, the Applicant started finding buyer and contacted many real estate brokers and known persons. As a result, three parties have given final offers, details of which are as under:

Sr. No.Date of Receipt of Offer Name of PartyAmount (Rs.)
124.03.2025Mr. Divyesh Dagliya1,30,00,000/-
224.03.2025Mr. Sachin Shah1,26,00,000/-
325.03.2025Mr. Dinesh Adani1,15,00,000/-

2.3 The Winding Up Committee at its meeting held on 27.03.2025 approved the highest offer which was received from Mr. Divyesh Dagliya (Successful Buyer). Accordingly, the Applicant has issued a letter of intent to the Successful Buyer on 01.04.2025. The Successful Buyer has also made the advance payment of 10% on 02.04.2025. In the circumstances, the Applicant has filed the present Application.

3. Analysis and Findings

3.1 We have heard the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Applicant and also perused the documents on record.

3.2 Before dealing with the submissions in the present application it is appropriate to extract the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and the NCLT Rules, 2016:

“290. Powers and duties of Company Liquidator. —

(1) Subject to directions by the Tribunal, if any, in this regard, the Company Liquidator, in a winding up of a company by the Tribunal, shall have the power —

(a) ……

(b) ……

(c) to sell the immovable and movable property and actionable claims of the company by public auction or private contract, with power to transfer such property to any person or body corporate, or to sell the same in parcels.

………

(2) The exercise of powers by the Company Liquidator under sub-section

(1) shall be subject to the overall control of the Tribunal.”

“11. Inherent Powers. –

Nothing in these rules shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent powers of the Tribunal to make such orders as may be necessary for meeting the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the Tribunal.”

A plain reading of the aforesaid provisions makes it clear that the sale of immovable and movable property and actionable claims of the company by public auction or private contract shall be subject to the directions by the Tribunal and shall be subject to the overall control of the Tribunal.

3.3 The records reveal that the Company has only one asset i.e. the said Property which is an office premise located on 3rd Floor, Continuum Tower, Ram Mandir Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai-400057. The developer has handed over the said premises to the Applicant after much persuasion on 23.12.2024. The valuation of the said Property is as under:

ValuerReport datedFair Value (Rs.)Liquidation Value

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top