SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5523

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Member (Judicial), Sh. Charanjeet Singh Gulati, Member (Technical)
The Federal Bank Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Pramod Dattaram Rasam – Respondent
I.A. 2025/2022 In C.P. No. (IB) 3978/MB/C-III/2019



Advocates:
For the Applicant : Adv. Akash Menon, Adv. Shruti Singhi
For the Resolution Professional : Adv. Pooja Gera, Adv. Dhwani Bagdai

Funds in a Pool Account for Pre-paid Payment Instruments belong to customers and not the Corporate Debtor, as per RBI guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 60(5) - Dispute arising over the funds in a Pool Account maintained under a business correspondent agreement regarding Pre-paid Payment Instruments (PPI) - Corporate Debtor’s claim over these funds rejected as being non-assets of the Corporate Debtor based on RBI guidelines on PPIs. (Paras 5, 10, 46, 50)

(B) Financial Creditor Rights - Applicant sought to clarify and assert the non-inclusion of Pool Account funds in the Corporate Debtor's assets, highlighting adherence to RBI regulations surrounding customer refunds. (Paras 36, 50)

Facts of the case:
The Applicant, a banking company, entered into an agreement with TMW Fintech Pvt. Ltd. for maintaining a Pool Account for customer transactions, which the Corporate Debtor failed to prefund, leading to insolvency proceedings.

Findings of Court:
Funds in the Pool Account established to be customer-based and thus not part of the Corporate Debtor's assets, requiring refunds to customers as per RBI guidelines.

Issues: The Court addressed whether the funds in the Pool Account rightfully belong to the Corporate Debtor and the valid usage of these funds for customer refunds.

Ratio Decidendi: Funds in the Pool Account are deemed to belong to the customers and should remain outside the assets of the Corporate Debtor, aligning with the legal requirements per RBI guidelines.

Result: The prayer to clarify ownership of the Pool Account funds was granted, allowing for customer refunds.

Table of Content
1. contentions raised concerning the resolution process and rights of creditors. (Para 1 , 17 , 30)
2. overview of pool account operations and obligations. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10)
3. ownership of funds in the pool account examined regarding rbi guidelines. (Para 35 , 36 , 46)
4. court's directive for customer refunds amidst insolvency proceedings. (Para 50 , 51)

ORDER

1. The above I.A. is filed by the Applicant, Federal Bank Limited, under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”), seeking following reliefs:

a) To allow the application and reject the Resolution Plan as accepted by the COC which includes the Pool Account as a part of the Resolution Plan;

b) Clarify that the funds in the Pool Account do not belong to the Corporate Debtor;

c) Pass an ad-interim ex-parte order permitting the Applicant to utilize the funds in the Pool Account for making refunds to the customers of the TMW Program.

Brief Background:

2. The Applicant is a banking company, licensed under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and is classified as a scheduled commercial bank under second schedule of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

3. M/s TMW Fintech Private Limited (Corporate Debtor), formerly known as the Mobile Wallet Pvt. Ltd., approached the Applicant with the intention of launching, promoting and distributing TMW-Federal co- branded Pre-paid Payment Instruments (PPIs) (hereinafter referred to asTMW Program”). Pursuant thereto, a business correspondent agreement dated 16.01.2018 was executed between the Applicant and the Corporate Debtor.

4. It is submitted that in accordance with the terms of the said agreement, the Corporate Debtor opened a non-operative current account bearing No. 16820200005372 (Pool Account) which was maintained by the Corporate Debtor and was solely used for settling the transactions undertaken by the customers under the TMW Program. It is further submitted that only the Applicant had the right and authority to operate the said Pool Account as per the extant RBI guidelines applicable to PPIs. Notably, the Corporate Debtor did not even have access to the bank statement of the Pool Account. The Corporate Debtor was only responsible to pre-fund the Pool Account with the funds received from the customers under the TMW Program and they never had any right of use over the funds in the Pool Account nor did they have any right to deal with the funds in the Pool Account. There are email exchanges between the Applicant and Corporate Debtor, annexed to the Application, wherein the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the same.

5. It is submitted that the Corporate Debtor failed to pre-fund the Pool Account as per the agreement and requested the Financial Creditor for advances to meet its obligations. In view of the assurances provided by the Corporate Debtor, the Financial Creditor approved and advanced monies to the Corporate Debtor from time to time which were then utilized to pre-fund the Pool Account. It was agreed that the funds advanced by the Applicant was to be settled by the Corporate Debtor within T + I days.

6. However, the Corporate Debtor failed in its obligations to repay the amount owed to the Applicant, consequently, the Applicant issued Bank Termination Notice dated 10.10.2019 terminating the Agreement in terms of Clause 23.2.1. However, as per the Agreement, despite termination, the funds in the Pool Account shall be continued to be utilized towards transactions undertaken by the customers on their PPIs including any claim for the refund that may be made by the customer on their PPIs. The same was also recorded in the Bank Termination Agreement.

7. The Corporate Debtor failed to repay the amount to the Applicant and consequently, the Applicant filed a petition no. CP(IB)/664/MB/2021 under Section 7 of the I&B Code. During the pendency of the said Petition, the Applicant continued to receive refund requests from customers of the TMW Program, which were duly processed by the Applicant in accordan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top