Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
HON’BLE MR. HARNAM SINGH THAKUR, HON’BLE MR. SUBRATA KUMAR DASH, JJ
M/s Tata Project Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Vikram Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of parties and scope of claims (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. assessment of ownership based on contractual documents (Para 14) |
| 3. order summary and adjudication (Para 15) |
ORDER
IA No. 139/2019, 170/2019, along with IA No. 319/2021 Allahabad (re-registered as RT-CA 319/Chd/Alb/2022) (as amended by IA No. 283/2023), IA No. 477/2021 are inter-related as these IAs deal with the claim for the custody of the same equipments by different parties. In view of the same, these IAs are taken up together for discussion and adjudication.
2. By our order dated 19.01.2023, we had allowed SEUP Power Transmission Company Limited to be impleaded as a respondent in CA No. 139/2019, 170/2019 and IA No. 477/2021 after making a reference to the decision of the Hon'ble Principal Bench dated 23.05.2022. By IA No. 283/2023, the applicant sought to bring certain amendments on the list of equipments on record in CA No. 319/2019. It is stated by the learned senior counsel that Schedule A is part of amended CA No. 319/2019.
3. As recorded in our daily order dated 16.03.2023, a copy of the Resolution Plan of SEUP which was approved by Adjudicating Authority on 26.03.2022 was filed before this Bench
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
