2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 1438
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Shri Rohit Kapoor, Member (Judicial), Shri Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical)
Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited – Respondent
I.A. (IB) No. 1391/KB/2023 | CP (IB) No. 891/KB/2020
For the Applicant/RP: Ravi Sethna
For the Respondents: N/A
The approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code extinguishes all pre-existing claims against the corporate debtor not included in the plan, reinforcing legal protections for the debtor.
Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Sections 30(6), 31(1), and 7 - Approval of resolution plan for corporate debtor following infrastructure complications - The resolution plan proposed by BTL EPC Limited is approved with over 90% voting share from the Committee of Creditors, meeting compliance requirements. The court emphasizes that claims not included in the resolution plan shall be extinguished and the debtor is insulated from liabilities prior to approval - Adjudicating Authority confirms adherence to statutory obligations and grants necessary waivers for implementation, ensuring revival of the corporate debtor. (Paras 29-42)
(B) Authority and Duties of Resolution Applicant - The resolution plan must include provisions for the management of the corporate debtor, compliance timelines, effective dates for implementation, and waivers from creditors, aligning with legal obligations (Paras 31-34).
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incorporation of insolvency application details (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. constitution and meetings of committee of creditors (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. expressions of interest process (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. evaluation of resolution plans (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. approval and compliance of resolution plans (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court's observations and legal references (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. binding nature of approved resolution plan (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. final orders and directives (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
ORDER
Per Coram
1. This Court convened through hybrid mode.
Preliminary
2. I.A. (IB) No. 1391/KB/2023 is an application under section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, after approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (“CoC”)
3. This application was filed by Mr. Ravi Sethia, Resolution Professional of McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited [CIN: L45202WB1961PLC025181] by invoking the provisions of section 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code” or “IBC”) read with regulation 39(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (“CIRP Regulations”) for approval of a Resolution Plan in respect of McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited (“Corporate Debtor”).
4. The underlying Company Petition in C.P. (IB) No. 891/KB/2020 was filed by Bank of India, the Financial Creditor against McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited, the Corporate Debtor, to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”), under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, which was admitted vide order dated 29 April 2022.
5. Initially, Mr. Anuj Jain was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). At the 1st meeting of the CoC held on 03 June 2022, the CoC proposed to appoint Mr. Ravi Sethia, the Applicant herein, as the Resolution Professional. The appointment of the Resolution Professional was confirmed by this Adjudicating Authority on 26 August 2022.
Constitution of CoC
6. The IRP made public announcement on 07 May 2022 in Financial Express, the Telegraph (English) (Kolkata Edition) and EkDin (Bengali) (Kolkata Edition) newspapers regarding initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and called proof of claims from the financial and operational creditors, workers and employees of the corporate debtor in the specified forms. The last date of submission of claims was 18 May 2022.
7. The CoC was constituted on 25 May 2022, with the following creditors as members of the CoC:
| Sl. No. | Name of the Creditor | % Voting Share |
| 1. | Bank of India | 19.48% |
| 2. | Axis Bank Limited | 14.74% |
| 3. | State Bank of India | 13.75% |
| 4. | IDBI Bank Limited | 10.22% |
| 5. | ICICI Bank Limited | 9.94% |
| 6. | Punjab National Bank | 7.70% |
| 7. | Union Bank of India | 6.78% |
| 8. | Karur Vysya Bank Limited | 4.51% |
| 9. | Indian Bank | 3.54% |
| 10. | Standard Chartered Bank | 2.43% |
| 11. | EIG (Mauritius) | 2.12% |
| 12. | Bank of Baroda | 1.92% |
| 13. | Canara Bank | 1.14% |
| 14. | UCO Bank | 0.99% |
| 15. | DCB Bank Limited | 0.29% |
| 16. | Kotak Mahindra Bank | 0.26% |
| 17. | Eveready Industries India Ltd. | 0.11% |
| 18. | Anchor Investments Private Limited | 0.05% |
| 19. | DBS Bank | 0.04% |
| TOTAL | 100% |
8. A report on the constitution of the CoC, was filed before the Adjudicating Authority. The list of creditors was updated from time to time and uploaded in the IBBI website.
9. The Applicant states that a total of thirty-two CoC meetings have been held during CIRP period, as follows:
| Particulars | Date of the CoC Meeting |
| 1st CoC meeting | 03.06.2022 |
| 2nd CoC meeting | 29.06.2022 |
| 3rd CoC meeting | 04.07.2022 |
| 4th CoC meeting | 10.08.2022 |
| 5th CoC meeting | 14.09.2022 |
| 6th CoC meeting | 10.10.2022 |
| 7th CoC meeting | 11.11.2022 |
| 8th CoC meeting | 25.11.2022 |
| 9th CoC meeting | 06.12.2022 |
| 10th CoC meeting | 12.12.2022 |
| 11th CoC meeting | 20.12.2022 |
| 12th CoC meeting | 07.01.2023 |
| 13th CoC meeting | 13.01.2023 |
| 14th CoC meeting | 21.01.2023 |
| 15th CoC meeting | 21.02.2023 |
| 16th CoC meeting | 01.03.2023 |
| 17th CoC meeting | 06.03.2023 |
| 18th CoC meeting | 17.03.2023 |
| 19th CoC meeting | 21 |