SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4730

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR, PRESIDENT
Mohit Baluja – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Pasari – Respondent
TA(IBC)-30(PB)/2025 | C.P. No. 127 of 2024 | C.P. No. 138 of 2024 | C.P. (IB) No. 380/KB/2024



Advocates:
For the Applicant: Mr. Gaurav Rana
For the Respondent: Mr. Vidhan Vyas, Syed Haider Shah

Distinct adjudication of companies facing separate legal proceedings is necessary to avoid confusion in insolvency matters.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Sections 241-242 - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 7 - Transfer application seeking to consolidate related company petitions for adjudication - The court held that the separate petitions under the Companies Act must be addressed distinctly by the concerned courts - The intertwining nature of the claims necessitated individual adjudication. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Transfer of proceedings - The court must consider whether the cases are intrinsically linked for effective adjudication - The court found that the cases did not correlate sufficiently to justify transfer, emphasizing clarity and separate dispute handling. (Paras 8, 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The transfer application resulted from two petitions filed under sections 241-242 of the Companies Act by shareholders, addressing disputes against the same respondent company, and seeking to link it with a separate insolvency petition that was running concurrently.

Findings of Court:
Both matters were deemed to require distinct handling due to their standalone nature, ensuring clarity in adjudication without confusion arising from intertwining procedures.

Issues: Whether two separate company petitions could be consolidated under one bench for adjudication or handled separately.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted that petitions stemming from different legal grounds should be adjudicated separately to avoid confusion, underlining the need for clarity in complex insolvency matters.

Result: The transfer application was dismissed as unnecessary.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL: NEW DELHI

SINGLE PRINCIPAL BENCH

ITEM No. 10

TA(IBC)-30(PB)/2025 IN THE MATTER OF:

Mohit Baluja …. Petitioner/Applicant

Vs

Vineet Pasari …. Respondent

Order under Rule 16(d) of NCLT Rules, 2016.

Order delivered on 22.08.2025

CORAM:

JUSTICE RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR

HON’BLE PRESIDENT

HYBRID HEARING (PHYSICAL & VC)

PRESENT:

For the Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate

For the Respondent : Mr. Vidhan Vyas, Syed Haider Shah, Advs. for R1

ORDER

1. The present Transfer application has been filed seeking

following reliefs:

“a) An order directing C.P. (IB) No.380/KB/2024 (Vineet Pasarivs Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd.) be transferred to Bench-I of the Hon'ble NCLT, Kolkata Bench, before which C.P No.127 of 2024 (Vineet Pasari vs Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd) and C.P No. 138 of 2024 (Mohit Baluja vs Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd and Ors.) is pending.

b) Ad-interim orders in terms of prayers above;

c) Such further order or orders be passed and/or direction or directions be given as this Hon'ble Tribunal

may deem fit and proper.”

2. The present Transfer Applications i.e. TA(IBC)-30(PB)/2025 has been filed by Mr. Mohit Baluja under Rule l6 (d) of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 read with Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 seeking transfer of the C.P. (IB) No.380/KB/2024 titled as Vineet Pasari vs Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd. to Bench-I of the Hon'ble NCLT, Kolkata Bench.

3. Heard, Ld. Counsel Mr. Gaurav Rana for the Applicant and Ld. Counsel for the Respondent no. 1.

4. The brief fact of the case resulting in the filing of the present transfer applications is as follows. It is stated by Ld. Counsel for the applicant that a petition under Section 241- 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was filed by Vineet Pasari one of the shareholder of R-2 Company before Kolkata Bench numbered as C.P. No. 127 of 2024, which was listed and heard by Court I, NCLT, Kolkata.

5. Further another petition under Section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was filed by the Applicant herein before the Kolkata Bench numbered as C.P. No. 138 of 2024 (Mohit Baluja vs Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.) which was listed and heard by Court II, NCLT, Kolkata. Thereafter a transfer application was filed by the applicant before the this Adjudicating Authority numbered as TA(Co. Act) 23(PB)/2024 (Mohit Baluja Vs Infigon Ventures Private Limited & Ors) seeking transfer and tagging of C.P No. 138 of 2024 with C.P No. 127 of 2024 for hearing and adjudication of both the matters by one Bench of the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench I.

6. This Adjudicating Authority allowed the Transfer Application vide order dated 12.07.2024 and C.P No. 138 of 2024 pending before court II of the NCLT Kolkata Bench was transferred to Court I. At present, effectively, both the cases i.e. C.P. No. 127 of 2024 and C.P. No. 138 of 2024 are pending before Court-I, NCLT, Kolkata.

7. In the meanwhile, it is stated a Section 7 petition has been filed before NCLT, Kolkata bearing Company Petition No. (IB)380/KB/2024 titled as Vineet Pasari vs M/s Infigon Ventures Pvt. Ltd., & Ors., on account of underlying debt and default, which is listed and pending adjudication before Court-II, NCLT, Kolkata. In light of the above, factual matrix, the applicant seeks states that the two Company Petitions pending before NCLT Kolkata, Court-I, is intrinsically linked and connected, and is material for proper adjudication of the insolvency petition. Therefore, the applicant seek transfer of the Company Petition No. (IB)380/KB/2024 from Court, II to Court-1 NCLT, Kolkata where other matters filed under Section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are pending adjudication.

8. Notice in the application was issued on 27.05.2025 and the Reply was filed by the Respondent on 21.07.2025.

9. Heard Ld. Counsels appearing on both the side. Having considered the arguments, I am not inclined to order the transfer of the Section 7 case bearing Company Petition No. 380/KB/2024 from Court-II, NCLT,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top