Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
T. Krishnavalli, Manoj Kumar Dubey, JJ
SOUTHERN PARADISE STUD AND DEVELOPERSFARMS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. second motion petition for scheme. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. hearing process and notice requirements. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. financial statements and auditor certificates. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. scheme appointed and effective dates. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. observations of regulatory authorities. (Para 12) |
| 6. objections by karnataka industrial areas development board. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. concern from income tax department. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. reports from rbi and other regulators. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. absence of objections or pending proceedings. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. court's review of parties' pleadings. (Para 27) |
| 11. court's approval based on contentions. (Para 28) |
| 12. description of the approved scheme. (Para 29) |
| 13. formal order disposal of the case. (Para 30 , 31) |
ORDER
Per: Manoj Kumar Dubey, Member (Technical)
1. This is a second motion petition filed by Southern Paradise Stud and Developers Farms Pvt. Ltd. (for brevity, the ‘Petitioner No.1/Transferor Company No.1’), Embassy Housing Finance and Developments Pvt. Ltd. (for brevity, the ‘Petitioner No.2/Transferor Company No.2’), Embassy Inn Pvt. Ltd. (for brevity, the ‘Petitioner No.3/Transferor Company No.3’), & Embass
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
