SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4899

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Sh. Praveen Gupta, Member (Judicial), Sh. Ashish Verma, Member (Technical)
Amrex Marketing Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Shri Gang Industries & Allied Products Limited – Respondent
CA No.24/ALD/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Niharika Ahluwalia
For the Respondents: Sh. Saurabh Kalia, Sh. Shishir

A continuing cause of action permits rectification claims under Section 59, despite the lapse of time, when company inaction and SEBI guidelines influence the registration of share transfers.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 2013 - Sections 58 and 59 - Share transfer dispute - Petitioner sought registration of 50,000 equity shares transferred from Respondent No. 3 - Respondent No. 1's delay in registration was challenged - Court held that ongoing correspondence established a continuing cause of action - The Petitioner complied with necessary legal requirements - Limitation argument rejected as Respondent's inaction constituted unnecessary delay - Directive issued for transfer and rectification of the register. (Paras 27-49)

(B) Limitation - Requirement for timely action - The statutory limitation period applies; however, Respondent's actions (or inactions) extended the period of relevance, allowing for rectification under Section 59. (Paras 27-33)

(C) SEBI Guidelines - The applicability of the SEBI Circular permitting share transfers under specific conditions was upheld, asserting that procedural stipulations serve to facilitate shareholder rights and should apply retrospectively. (Paras 42-46)

Facts of the case:
The dispute arose when the Petitioner attempted to transfer shares of Respondent No. 1, which had been lodged multiple times since 2010 but faced undelivered returns due to corporate neglect—confusion in correspondence persisted for years due to corporate restructuring and the lack of formal communication from Respondent No. 1 regarding the transfer status. (Paras 1-20)

Findings of Court:
The Petitioner's compliance with share transfer regulations was deemed sufficient despite the Respondent's claims; unnecessary delays by Respondent No. 1 required administrative rectification. (Paras 32-38)

Issues: Central questions included the applicability of statutory limitation under the Companies Act, requirements for share transfer compliance, and the effect of SEBI guidelines on the ongoing process. (Paras 26-41)

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal held that protracted negotiations and acknowledgment by Respondent No. 1 validated the long-standing request. Inaction and lack of communication amounted to a continuous cause of action, necessitating action under section 59 for transfer registration. (Paras 30-31)

Result: The Petition was allowed; Respondent No. 1 directed to register the shares in favor of Amrex Marketing within ten days. (Para 48)

Table of Content
1. facts of the petitioner's share transfer request. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
2. arguments presented by respondent no. 1. (Para 22 , 24)
3. court's analysis on limitation and compliance. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
4. ratio decidendi affirming the validity of petitioner's transfer. (Para 47)
5. final decision to transfer shares to the petitioner. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)

ORDER

1. The present Company Petition is being filed under Sections 58 and 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 , (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) by Amrex Marketing Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant / Petitioner Company”) seeking directions for recording the transfer of shares, consequential rectification of the register, and deletion of the name of ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited (ICICI Equity Fund) (Transferor) (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent No. 3 / Proforma Respondents”) from the register of members of Shri Gang Industries & Allied Products Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent No. 1”), and for recording the name of the Petitioner Company by giving effect to the Share Transfer Form executed between the Petitioner Company and the Respondents. The main reliefs sought by the Petitioner are as under:

i. Pass an order directing the Respondent No. 1 Company to record the transfer of 50,000 equity shares of the Respondent No. 1 Company of Face value in the name of the Petitioner Company held under Folio No. 41504 of Shri Gang Industries and Allied Products (erstwhile Suraj Vanaspati) in the name of Amrex Marketing Private Limited;

ii. Pass an order directing the Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 to record the name of the Petitioner Company on the new share certificates;

OR;

iii. Alternatively, pass an order directing the Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 to record the name of the Petitioner Company i.e. Amrex Marketing Private Limited on the “Letter of Confirmation”.

AND;

iv. Pass an order imposing costs on the Respondent No. 1 and 2 for harassing the Petitioner Company, a bonafide shareholder.

2. The brief facts leading to the present case are that Respondent No. 3 issued a public notice dated 16.09.2009 inviting applications for purchasing shares of different companies on a portfolio basis. In pursuance thereof, the Petitioner Company applied to purchase the shares of Respondent No. 1.

3. It is submitted that on 20.06.2010, the Petitioner Company, in response to an offer for sale of shares of Respondent No. 1 Company made by ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited (Respondent No. 3), on behalf of ICICI Equity Fund, acquired 50,000 shares of Respondent No. 1 Company by executing a Share Transfer Form 7-B having Registered Folio No. 41504.

4. It is further submitted that on 25.06.2010, the Petitioner Company, vide letter dated 25.06.2010, lodged the aforesaid shares for transfer by sending all documents, including the original share certificates and share transfer form, to Respondent No. 1. However, the said documents were received back as undelivered.

5. It is submitted that the Petitioner Company was informed by Respondent No. 2 (Share Transfer Agent of Respondent No. 1) that Respondent No. 1 Company was undergoing major changes in its functioning and place of business.

6. Later, in the year 2016, the Petitioner Company observed that Respondent No. 1 Company was functioning smoothly. Hence, the Petitioner Company further approached Respondent No. 1 at its previous address, vide letter dated 07.05.2016, seeking its correct address in order to bring into effect the pending transfer of shares in the name of the Petitioner Company.

7. It is further submitted that the Petitioner Company received the correct address of Respondent No. 1 Company through its Share Transfer Agent, Respondent No. 2 vide letter dated 25.05.2016. Respondent No. 2 further

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top