SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 4988

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
MANNI SANKARIAH SHANMUGA SUNDARAM, ATUL CHATURVEDI, JJ
ENPRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/S UTTAM SUCROTECH INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
C.P. (IB) No. 791/ND/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Juneja
For the Respondents: Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Senior Adv., Mr. Hardik Jain, Mr. Rustam Chaudhuri

An insolvency application is not maintainable if there exists a genuine pre-existing dispute regarding the debt before the issuance of a demand notice.

Headnote:(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9 - Application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Operational Creditor filed against Corporate Debtor for outstanding dues; issues on pre-existing disputes and compliance with payment terms under Purchase Order arise. - Corporate Debtor raised genuine disputes about non-compliance and outstanding documents necessary for payment. Application dismissed for lack of maintainability. (Paras 6, 10, 13, 16)

(B) Pre-existing dispute - Existence of real dispute on quality, payment delays, and compliance can negate application for insolvency. (Paras 14, 15)

Facts of the case:
Operational Creditor claims default of Rs. 3,40,05,981/- based on Purchase Order, while Corporate Debtor asserted issues of non-compliance with payment stipulations, including Advance Bank Guarantee. Finding pre-existing disputes related to quality and delivery and non-fulfillment of payment conditions; dispute genuine and substantial.

Findings of Court:
The application was not maintainable due to evidence of real disputes and lack of compliance with contractual terms by the Operational Creditor.

Issues: Main issue was whether a pre-existing dispute existed prior to demand notice.

Ratio Decidendi: Application under Section 9 cannot proceed if a genuine dispute existed before demand notice issuance; substantial correspondence supports pre-existing dispute.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. application for cirp filed by operational creditor. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. corporate debtor raises defenses against claims of non-payment. (Para 4 , 5)
3. jurisdiction and timeliness of filing. (Para 6 , 7)
4. existence of pre-existing dispute is crucial. (Para 10 , 14)
5. final ruling dismissing the application. (Para 16)

ORDER

PER: MANNI SANKARIAH SHANMUGA SUNDARAM, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) 1. This instant application was filed by M/s Enpro Industries Private Limited (hereinafter referred as ‘Applicant’/ ‘Operational Creditor’), having office at Plot No. A-17 & 18, ’H’ Block, MIDC Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra – 411018 under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for brevity ‘the Code’) with a prayer to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of M/s Uttam Sucrotech International Private Limited, (hereinafter referred as ‘Respondent Company’ or ‘Corporate Debtor’).

2. The Respondent Company M/s Uttam Sucrotech International Private Limited having CIN: U29100DL2011PTC228755 was incorporated on 14.12.2011 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office situated at No. 95, F.I.E. Patparganj Industrial Area, New Delhi- 110092. The Corporate Debtor is engaged in the business of manufacturing, erection, supply, and commissioning of various electrical sugar plants and refineries. The Respondent Company has successfully executed multiple projects of national and international significance and is recognized as a pioneer in its field.

3. The total amount of default alleged in Part-IV of the application preferred under Section is Rs. 3,40,05,981/- (Rupees Three Crores Forty Lakh Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-One Only) including an Interest @ 24% from the due date of invoices 30.10.2021 till the date of actual realization and other charges along with interest thereto.

4. Submissions by the Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Operational Creditor.

a. The Operational Creditor entered into a Purchase Order dated 10.09.2020 with the Corporate (CD) for the manufacture and supply of boiler components valued at Rs. 2,02,00,000/-. The Corporate Debtor released the amount of Rs. 20,20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakh Twenty Thousand Only) i.e., 10% of purchase order value i.e. 2,02,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Two Lakhs Only) as an advance to the Operational Creditor on 31st December, 2020.

b. It is submitted that as per the terms of Para 3 (b) of the purchase order dated 10.09.2020 Operational Creditor raised the invoice dated 26.03.2021 amounting to Rs. 30,30,000 (i.e. 15 % of PO value as an advance on receipt and identification of Raw material, proforma invoice and Advance Bank Guarantee) and provided the Advance Bank Guarantee dated 25.03.2021 issued by the SBI Bank for invoice amounting to Rs. 30,30,000 (the 15% value of the Purchase Order). However, the Corporate Debtor failed to make the payment of the outstanding amount due and payable to Operational Creditor.

c. The Operational Creditor for the balance 75% of PO value raised the proforma invoice dated 30.10.2021 amounting to Rs.1,87,86,000. However, the Corporate Debtor failed to make the payment of the outstanding amount due and payable to Operational Creditor.

d. On 06.09.2023, the OC issued a demand notice under Section 8 of the IBC, calling upon the CD to pay a total of Rs. 3,40,05,034/-. Subsequently, the Corporate Debtor replied to the said Demand Notice vide reply dated 25.09.2023, raising frivolous and bogus dispute against the Corporate Debtor. Further the Corporate Debtor acknowledged its liability and stated to amicably settle the dispute between the parties. In response to the aforesaid reply, the Operational Creditor sent a response to the Corporate Debtor on 27.11.2023 and asked the Corporate Debtor to unconditionally repay the unpaid operational debt (in default).

e. The Corporate Debtor is liable to pay to the Operational Creditor a total sum of total sum of Rs. 2,05,68,435/- along-with an interest @ 18% per ann

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top