Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
SHRI. VINAY GOEL, SMT. MADHU SINHA, JJ
Hiran Valiyakkil Lal – Appellant
Versus
K.V.Sreeja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial aspects of winding-up petition cited. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. discussion on document presentation for maintainability. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. arguments against substitution and committee compliance noted. (Para 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. court findings on partner movements and compliance. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. final observations on compliance and legal standings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. petition dismissal and settlement outcomes. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
ORDER
Per Coram:
1. This Winding-Up Petition has been filed by one of the partners of M/s Hardoll Enterprises under the provisions of the LLP Act, 2008. This Tribunal issued notice, and the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 appeared through their counsel. The respondents No.2 to 5 in the main Petition filed objections on the maintainability application. The said objections were allowed by this Tribunal vide order dated 09.08.2023. Thereafter Petitioner in the main Petition approached the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. The Hon’ble High Court of Kerala has set aside the order of this Tribunal vide the Judgement dated 11.10.2023 in OP(C) No. 1859 of 2023 and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. This Tribunal, after hearing both sides again passe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
