NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Sh. Prabhat Kumar, MEMBER (TECHNICAL), Sh. Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
Gitanjali Gems Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bezel Jewelry (India) Private Limited – Respondent
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
COURT ROOM NO. 1
MUMBAI BENCH
Item No. 34
CP/107(MB)2025
CORAM:
SH. PRABHAT KUMAR SH. SUSHIL MAHADEORAO KOCHEY HON’BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL) HON’BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
ORDER SHEET OF THE HEARING ON 23.09.2025
NAME OF THE PARTIES: GITANJALI GEMS LIMITED THROUGH V/s
BEZEL JEWELRY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
Section 271-273 of the Companies Act, 2013
ORDER
CP/107(MB)2025
1. Adv. Rohit Gupta, Adv. Abha Patel i/b Fortis India Law for the Petitioner are
present.
2. This is an Application filed by Gitanjali Gems Limited Through, its Liquidator,
Mr. Santanu T Ray under Section 271-273 of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 9 of the Companies (Winding Up) Rules, 2020 r/w Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules,
2016. The Applicant seeking following reliefs :
a. This Tribunal be pleased to dispense with the requirement of filing a
statement of affairs of the Respondent No.1 Company proposed to be wound up, as contemplated under Section 272(4) of the Companies Act,
2013;
b. This Tribunal be pleased to dispense with the requirement for a special
resolution to be passed either by the board of the Respondent No.1
company or in the shareholder’s meeting of the Respondent No.1 Company or any resolution of the Pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.